Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderator guidelines: Difference between revisions
→Question: new section |
→Question: Reply |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Just a few typos == | ==Just a few typos== | ||
#* Note: it is permissible for an incident to be positive, as long as it is both noteable <-notable | #*Note: it is permissible for an incident to be positive, as long as it is both noteable <-notable | ||
# The company does not have an existing page, which the artice <- article | #The company does not have an existing page, which the artice <- article | ||
#* The level of managerial independance <- independence | #*The level of managerial independance <- independence | ||
#* The level of managerial independance - how independant <- independent | #*The level of managerial independance - how independant <- independent | ||
* Stub (for an article which is simply underdeveloped: the content currentlyu <- | *Stub (for an article which is simply underdeveloped: the content currentlyu <- | ||
lead to deletion if it's in massive violation of the No Original Reaearch <- | lead to deletion if it's in massive violation of the No Original Reaearch <- | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Basically a limbo to put articles in where their merits can be discussed before a descision <- decision | Basically a limbo to put articles in where their merits can be discussed before a descision <- decision | ||
* Demonstrate (through evidence, and assertion by sources, not thorugh <- through | *Demonstrate (through evidence, and assertion by sources, not thorugh <- through | ||
* If the Incident affected only a small hanfdful <- | *If the Incident affected only a small hanfdful <- | ||
* '''The article should be neutral and factual,''' without unneccesarily -< unnecessarily | *'''The article should be neutral and factual,''' without unneccesarily -< unnecessarily | ||
A user reported that an Amazon delivery driver accessed their garage through their phone without authorization | A user reported that an Amazon delivery driver accessed their garage through their phone without authorization | ||
#* Demonstrate a pattern of similar incidents or systemic flaws in Amazon's delivery authorization <- authorisation? | #*Demonstrate a pattern of similar incidents or systemic flaws in Amazon's delivery authorization <- authorisation? | ||
#* Remove aricle, <- | #*Remove aricle, <- | ||
A person brought a 5-year-old iPhone 11 for battery replacement at official Apple Store in Rio. After a $170 service, both cameras stopped working. Apple blamed previous unauthorized <- unauthorised? | A person brought a 5-year-old iPhone 11 for battery replacement at official Apple Store in Rio. After a $170 service, both cameras stopped working. Apple blamed previous unauthorized <- unauthorised? | ||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
[[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 22:39, 25 April 2025 (UTC) | [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 22:39, 25 April 2025 (UTC) | ||
== Question == | ==Question== | ||
As part of these guidelines, it says this. | As part of these guidelines, it says this. | ||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
I have never seen the garbage template used, except for one time when I thought it was an alternative to deletionrequest. Is this still done? [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 07:23, 19 November 2025 (UTC) | I have never seen the garbage template used, except for one time when I thought it was an alternative to deletionrequest. Is this still done? [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 07:23, 19 November 2025 (UTC) | ||
:yep, have updated the text to remove reference to the garbage template [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 00:51, 20 November 2025 (UTC) | |||