7-Eleven: Difference between revisions

Line 14:

*Privacy Violations

*Security Vulnerabilities

*Overcharging Customers

*Gaining Monopoly over local stores

==Incidents==

Line 23:

Line 25:

On October 25, 2019, an customer from Australia reported the breach when he was able to access other customers personal information. In response, 7-Eleven temporary shut down the app, describing it as "an maintenance issue", and opening the app at 5:30 pm.<ref name=":0" /> It is unclear how many customer's were affected,<ref>{{Cite web |last=Hudson |first=Kristin |date=2019-11-01 |title=7-Eleven Customer Data Exposed in App Security Breach |url=https://www.identityiq.com/articles/7-eleven-customer-data-exposed-in-app-security-breach |url-status=live |access-date=2026-01-31 |website=Identity IQ}}</ref> however the hacker was never found.

==Lawsuits==

'''<big>7-Eleven Denmark Ransomware attack</big>'''

On August 8, 2022, 7-Eleven disclosed that around 175 stores checkout and payment systems were hacked, <ref>{{Cite web |last=Panettieri |first=Joe |date=2022-08-14 |title=7-Eleven Denmark Ransomware Cyberattack: Timeline Details and Recovery Updates |url=https://www.msspalert.com/news/7-eleven-denmark-cyberattack-details-and-recovery-timeline |url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-02 |website=MSSP Alert}}</ref> resulting in closure of 175 stores. The company initially responded by calling it an hacker attack, however on August 10, the company later backtracked and confirmed the attack was ransomware,<ref>{{Cite web |last=Cluley |first=Graham |date=2022-08-12 |title=Ransomware attack blamed for closure of all 7-Eleven stores in Denmark |url=https://www.tripwire.com/state-of-security/ransomware-attack-blamed-closure-7-eleven-stores-denmark |url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-02 |website=Fortra}}</ref> and on the same day, opened 110 of the original stores affected. It's not disclosed if any consumers were affected, or if any affiliated hacker groups were caught. <ref>{{Cite web |last=Abrams |first=Lawrence |date=2022-08-10 |title=7-Eleven Denmark confirms ransomware attack behind store closures |url=https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/7-eleven-denmark-confirms-ransomware-attack-behind-store-closures/ |url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-02 |website=Bleeping Computer}}</ref>

'''<big>7-Eleven Fuel Pump Problem</big>'''

In 2008, the Office of Fair Trading conducted an investigation in an 7-Eleven store from Australia that concluded in numerous items being overcharged. A year later, the Office of Fair Trading found that the original items were still overpriced, resulting in 7-Eleven receiving a fine of $4000. <ref>{{Cite web |last=Lawlor |first=Peter |date=2009-06-24 |title=7-Eleven store fined for false price scans |url=https://statements.qld.gov.au/statements/57188 |url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-02 |website=The Queensland Cabinet and Ministerial Directory}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Ayrouth |first=Elie |date=2011-05-17 |title=Is 7-Eleven Overcharging You At The Register? |url=https://www.foodbeast.com/news/is-7-eleven-overcharging-you-at-the-register/ |url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-02 |website=Food Beast}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2009-06-24 |title=7-Eleven fined for overcharging |url=https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/national/queensland/7eleven-fined-for-overcharging-20090624-cw5w.html |url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-02 |website=Brisbane Times}}</ref>

In 2018, it was reported that 7-Eleven was charging customers while the gas nozzle was not being used. When one customer reported this to the store clerk, the clerk responded with," there was nothing that can be done". After news of this incident gain traction with videos and news outlets reporting on the situation, 7-Eleven responded by shutting down the pumps and repairing it immediately, however it's unknown if customers were ever refunded. <ref>{{Cite web |last=Gatollari |first=Mustafa |date=2025-06-20 |title=Wonder How Long I Left It In:’ Driver Fills Up Gas at 7-Eleven. Then She Catches the Pump Still Charging After She’s Finished |url=https://www.motor1.com/news/763262/7-eleven-pump-charges-after-done-fueling/ |url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-02 |website=motor1.com}}</ref> <ref>{{Cite web |last=Meredith |first=Michelle |date=2018-05-30 |title=Ghost gas pump charges Orange County customers while they aren’t pumping |url=https://www.wesh.com/article/ghost-gas-pump-charges-orange-county-customers-while-they-arent-pumping/20956685 |url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-02 |website=Wesh}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Derridj |first=Mustapha |date=2025-08-10 |title=She Fills Up at 7-Eleven… and Notices the Pump Keeps Charging Even After It Stops |url=https://thenewswheel.com/she-fills-up-at-7-eleven-and-notices-the-pump-keeps-charging-even-after-it-stops/ |url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-02 |website=The News Wheel}}</ref>

On October 3, 2022, several people reported after paying for gas at 7-Eleven, the customers ended up with water in their tanks. The company responded by saying," ''"We received reports of tainted gas at 20955 Davenport Dr. in Sterling, VA and are currently investigating this matter further. Customers who believe their car was impacted may call 1-800-255-0711."'' Customers who reached out to the phone number experience slow responses. <ref>{{Cite web |last=FLORES |first=CHRISTIAN |date=2022-10-16 |title=2 more people had water in gas tank after fueling at Va. 7-Eleven, state confirms reports |url=https://kutv.com/news/nation-world/2-more-people-had-water-in-gas-tank-after-fueling-at-va-7-eleven-state-confirms-reports-sterling-locations-documentation-identical-car-issues-virginia-department-of-agriculture-and-consumer-services-tainted-gas-reports |url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-02 |website=2KUTV}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Flores |first=Christian |date=2022-10-16 |title=2 other people had water in gas tank after fueling at Sterling 7-Eleven, complaint reveals |url=https://wjla.com/news/local/7-eleven-gas-station-water-in-gas-tanks-sterling-loudoun-county-virginia-department-of-agriculture-and-consumer-services-vdacs-car-problems-mechanic |url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-02 |website=Fox17}}</ref>

A customer named Bradly had a comment about the situation, saying, "I would love for them to respond and compensate me for everything I've had to pay for so far."

Another was a customer was Garret, which he responded with," I'm not getting any feedback from 7-Eleven. I'm not getting any feedback from the insurance. What do you do?"

It is unclear whether the customers gotten refunded.

== '''<big>Lawsuits</big>''' ==

{| class="wikitable"

|Controversy

Line 59:

Line 81:

|7-Eleven and the manufacturer, Botanic Tonics, advertised Feel Free Wellness Tonics, as a safe, sober, and healthy alternative to alcohol despite containing kratom, an addictive opioid.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Mehorter |first=Kelly |date=2025-04-15 |title=$8.75 Million Botanic Tonics Settlement Reached in Feel Free Kratom Lawsuit |url=https://www.classaction.org/news/8.75-million-botanic-tonics-settlement-reached-in-feel-free-kratom-lawsuit |url-status=live |access-date=2026-01-31 |website=Class Action}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Avery |first=Brad |date=2023-04-06 |title=Class Action Alleges Feel Free, 7-Eleven Misled Consumers About Addiction Risk |url=https://www.bevnet.com/news/2023/class-action-alleges-feel-free-7-eleven-misled-consumers-about-addiction-risk/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260131234902/https://www.bevnet.com/news/2023/class-action-alleges-feel-free-7-eleven-misled-consumers-about-addiction-risk/ |archive-date=2026-01-31 |access-date=2026-01-31 |website=bevnet}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Hanson |first=Natalie |date=2023-12-21 |title=7-Eleven must face liability claims over sales of a drink containing kratom |url=https://www.courthousenews.com/7-eleven-must-face-liability-claims-for-selling-drink-containing-kratom/ |url-status=live |access-date=2026-01-31 |website=Courthouse News Service}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2026-01-31 |title=Torres v. Botanic Tonics, LLC |url=https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/9610947/torres-v-botanic-tonics-llc/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://cases.justia.com/federal/district-courts/california/candce/3:2023cv01460/410183/82/0.pdf |website=Court Listener}}</ref>

|The case reached a settlement of $8,750,000, requiring 7-Eleven to add kratom warnings on product labels and advertisements.

|

|- valign="top"

|7-Eleven acquiring an fuel outlet without prior notice

|2023

|7-Eleven violated an 2018 FTC consent order that prohibited acquiring fuel outlets in certain local markets without first notifying Federal Trade Commission to avoid harming competition and increasing fuel prices. 7-Eleven could've faced a maximum penalty of over $77 million.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Graham |first=Victoria |date=2023-12-04 |title=FTC Sues 7-Eleven for Anticompetitive Acquisition in Violation of 2018 Consent Order |url=https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/12/ftc-sues-7-eleven-anticompetitive-acquisition-violation-2018-consent-order |url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-02 |website=Federal Trade Commissions}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Graham |first=Victoria |date=2025-12-08 |title=7-Eleven to Pay Record $4.5 Million Penalty to Settle FTC Antitrust Order Violation Case |url=https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2025/12/7-eleven-pay-record-45-million-penalty-settle-ftc-antitrust-order-violation-case |url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-02 |website=Federal Trade Commissions}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Loder |first=Jessica |date=2023-12-05 |title=7-Eleven could face up to $77M in penalties in FTC lawsuit |url=https://www.cstoredive.com/news/7-eleven-77m-penalties-ftc-lawsuit/701614/ |url-status=live |access-date=2026-01-31 |website=C-Store Dive}}</ref>

|The case was settled, with 7-Eleven paying $4.5 million on December 8, 2025.

|

|}

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 *Privacy Violations
 *Security Vulnerabilities
+*Overcharging Customers
+*Gaining Monopoly over local stores
 ==Incidents==
@@ Line 23: / Line 25: @@
 On October 25, 2019, an customer from Australia reported the breach when he was able to access other customers personal information. In response, 7-Eleven temporary shut down the app, describing it as "an maintenance issue", and opening the app at 5:30 pm.<ref name=":0" /> It is unclear how many customer's were affected,<ref>{{Cite web |last=Hudson |first=Kristin |date=2019-11-01 |title=7-Eleven Customer Data Exposed in App Security Breach |url=https://www.identityiq.com/articles/7-eleven-customer-data-exposed-in-app-security-breach |url-status=live |access-date=2026-01-31 |website=Identity IQ}}</ref> however the hacker was never found.
-==Lawsuits==
+'''<big>7-Eleven Denmark Ransomware attack</big>'''
+On August 8, 2022, 7-Eleven disclosed that around 175 stores checkout and payment systems were hacked, <ref>{{Cite web |last=Panettieri |first=Joe |date=2022-08-14 |title=7-Eleven Denmark Ransomware Cyberattack: Timeline Details and Recovery Updates |url=https://www.msspalert.com/news/7-eleven-denmark-cyberattack-details-and-recovery-timeline |url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-02 |website=MSSP Alert}}</ref> resulting in closure of 175 stores. The company initially responded by calling it an hacker attack, however on August 10, the company later backtracked and confirmed the attack was ransomware,<ref>{{Cite web |last=Cluley |first=Graham |date=2022-08-12 |title=Ransomware attack blamed for closure of all 7-Eleven stores in Denmark |url=https://www.tripwire.com/state-of-security/ransomware-attack-blamed-closure-7-eleven-stores-denmark |url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-02 |website=Fortra}}</ref> and on the same day, opened 110 of the original stores affected. It's not disclosed if any consumers were affected, or if any affiliated hacker groups were caught. <ref>{{Cite web |last=Abrams |first=Lawrence |date=2022-08-10 |title=7-Eleven Denmark confirms ransomware attack behind store closures |url=https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/7-eleven-denmark-confirms-ransomware-attack-behind-store-closures/ |url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-02 |website=Bleeping Computer}}</ref>
+'''<big>7-Eleven Fuel Pump Problem</big>'''
+In 2008, the Office of Fair Trading conducted an investigation in an 7-Eleven store from Australia that concluded in numerous items being overcharged. A year later, the Office of Fair Trading found that the original items were still overpriced, resulting in 7-Eleven receiving a fine of $4000. <ref>{{Cite web |last=Lawlor |first=Peter |date=2009-06-24 |title=7-Eleven store fined for false price scans |url=https://statements.qld.gov.au/statements/57188 |url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-02 |website=The Queensland Cabinet and Ministerial Directory}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Ayrouth |first=Elie |date=2011-05-17 |title=Is 7-Eleven Overcharging You At The Register? |url=https://www.foodbeast.com/news/is-7-eleven-overcharging-you-at-the-register/ |url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-02 |website=Food Beast}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2009-06-24 |title=7-Eleven fined for overcharging |url=https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/national/queensland/7eleven-fined-for-overcharging-20090624-cw5w.html |url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-02 |website=Brisbane Times}}</ref>
+In 2018, it was reported that 7-Eleven was charging customers while the gas nozzle was not being used. When one customer reported this to the store clerk, the clerk responded with," there was nothing that can be done".  After news of this incident gain traction with videos and news outlets reporting on the situation, 7-Eleven responded by shutting down the pumps and repairing it immediately, however it's unknown if customers were ever refunded. <ref>{{Cite web |last=Gatollari |first=Mustafa |date=2025-06-20 |title=Wonder How Long I Left It In:’ Driver Fills Up Gas at 7-Eleven. Then She Catches the Pump Still Charging After She’s Finished |url=https://www.motor1.com/news/763262/7-eleven-pump-charges-after-done-fueling/ |url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-02 |website=motor1.com}}</ref> <ref>{{Cite web |last=Meredith |first=Michelle |date=2018-05-30 |title=Ghost gas pump charges Orange County customers while they aren’t pumping |url=https://www.wesh.com/article/ghost-gas-pump-charges-orange-county-customers-while-they-arent-pumping/20956685 |url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-02 |website=Wesh}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Derridj |first=Mustapha |date=2025-08-10 |title=She Fills Up at 7-Eleven… and Notices the Pump Keeps Charging Even After It Stops |url=https://thenewswheel.com/she-fills-up-at-7-eleven-and-notices-the-pump-keeps-charging-even-after-it-stops/ |url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-02 |website=The News Wheel}}</ref>
+On October 3, 2022, several people reported after paying for gas at 7-Eleven, the customers ended up with water in their tanks. The company responded by saying," ''"We received reports of tainted gas at 20955 Davenport Dr. in Sterling, VA and are currently investigating this matter further. Customers who believe their car was impacted may call 1-800-255-0711."'' Customers who reached out to the phone number experience slow responses. <ref>{{Cite web |last=FLORES |first=CHRISTIAN |date=2022-10-16 |title=2 more people had water in gas tank after fueling at Va. 7-Eleven, state confirms reports |url=https://kutv.com/news/nation-world/2-more-people-had-water-in-gas-tank-after-fueling-at-va-7-eleven-state-confirms-reports-sterling-locations-documentation-identical-car-issues-virginia-department-of-agriculture-and-consumer-services-tainted-gas-reports |url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-02 |website=2KUTV}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Flores |first=Christian |date=2022-10-16 |title=2 other people had water in gas tank after fueling at Sterling 7-Eleven, complaint reveals |url=https://wjla.com/news/local/7-eleven-gas-station-water-in-gas-tanks-sterling-loudoun-county-virginia-department-of-agriculture-and-consumer-services-vdacs-car-problems-mechanic |url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-02 |website=Fox17}}</ref>
+A customer named Bradly had a comment about the situation, saying, "I would love for them to respond and compensate me for everything I've had to pay for so far."
+Another was a customer was Garret, which he responded with," I'm not getting any feedback from 7-Eleven. I'm not getting any feedback from the insurance. What do you do?"
+It is unclear whether the customers gotten refunded.
+== '''<big>Lawsuits</big>''' ==
 {| class="wikitable"
 |Controversy
@@ Line 59: / Line 81: @@
 |7-Eleven and the manufacturer, Botanic Tonics, advertised Feel Free Wellness Tonics, as a safe, sober, and healthy alternative to alcohol despite containing kratom, an addictive opioid.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Mehorter |first=Kelly |date=2025-04-15 |title=$8.75 Million Botanic Tonics Settlement Reached in Feel Free Kratom Lawsuit |url=https://www.classaction.org/news/8.75-million-botanic-tonics-settlement-reached-in-feel-free-kratom-lawsuit |url-status=live |access-date=2026-01-31 |website=Class Action}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Avery |first=Brad |date=2023-04-06 |title=Class Action Alleges Feel Free, 7-Eleven Misled Consumers About Addiction Risk |url=https://www.bevnet.com/news/2023/class-action-alleges-feel-free-7-eleven-misled-consumers-about-addiction-risk/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260131234902/https://www.bevnet.com/news/2023/class-action-alleges-feel-free-7-eleven-misled-consumers-about-addiction-risk/ |archive-date=2026-01-31 |access-date=2026-01-31 |website=bevnet}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Hanson |first=Natalie |date=2023-12-21 |title=7-Eleven must face liability claims over sales of a drink containing kratom |url=https://www.courthousenews.com/7-eleven-must-face-liability-claims-for-selling-drink-containing-kratom/ |url-status=live |access-date=2026-01-31 |website=Courthouse News Service}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2026-01-31 |title=Torres v. Botanic Tonics, LLC |url=https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/9610947/torres-v-botanic-tonics-llc/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://cases.justia.com/federal/district-courts/california/candce/3:2023cv01460/410183/82/0.pdf |website=Court Listener}}</ref>
 |The case reached a settlement of $8,750,000, requiring 7-Eleven to add kratom warnings on product labels and advertisements.
+|
+|- valign="top"
+|7-Eleven acquiring an fuel outlet without prior notice
+|2023
+|7-Eleven violated an 2018 FTC consent order that prohibited acquiring fuel outlets in certain local markets without first notifying Federal Trade Commission to avoid harming competition and increasing fuel prices. 7-Eleven could've faced a maximum penalty of over $77 million.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Graham |first=Victoria |date=2023-12-04 |title=FTC Sues 7-Eleven for Anticompetitive Acquisition in Violation of 2018 Consent Order |url=https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/12/ftc-sues-7-eleven-anticompetitive-acquisition-violation-2018-consent-order |url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-02 |website=Federal Trade Commissions}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Graham |first=Victoria |date=2025-12-08 |title=7-Eleven to Pay Record $4.5 Million Penalty to Settle FTC Antitrust Order Violation Case |url=https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2025/12/7-eleven-pay-record-45-million-penalty-settle-ftc-antitrust-order-violation-case |url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-02 |website=Federal Trade Commissions}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Loder |first=Jessica |date=2023-12-05 |title=7-Eleven could face up to $77M in penalties in FTC lawsuit |url=https://www.cstoredive.com/news/7-eleven-77m-penalties-ftc-lawsuit/701614/ |url-status=live |access-date=2026-01-31 |website=C-Store Dive}}</ref>
+|The case was settled, with 7-Eleven paying $4.5 million on December 8, 2025.
 |
 |}