User talk:Banana: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 23 February by Sojourna in topic Changing Flock Safety archive links
→About the CRWCitationBot: Reply |
→Changing Flock Safety archive links: new section |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:Will check it out. I’m currently working on improving it and some pages vary from others really much. I plan to make sure all data is filled, than all data is same, and then fit it to needs of everyone. Will take few days to make it run properly, right now it was article by article with lots of manual checks. Bet I could just miss it, but thanks a lot for pointing this out [[User:Banana|Banana]] ([[User talk:Banana|talk]]) 05:56, 16 February 2026 (UTC) | :Will check it out. I’m currently working on improving it and some pages vary from others really much. I plan to make sure all data is filled, than all data is same, and then fit it to needs of everyone. Will take few days to make it run properly, right now it was article by article with lots of manual checks. Bet I could just miss it, but thanks a lot for pointing this out [[User:Banana|Banana]] ([[User talk:Banana|talk]]) 05:56, 16 February 2026 (UTC) | ||
::okay, found issue and fixed it, wil lrun a job to clean up all citations with duplications [[User:Banana|Banana]] ([[User talk:Banana|talk]]) 06:05, 16 February 2026 (UTC) | ::okay, found issue and fixed it, wil lrun a job to clean up all citations with duplications [[User:Banana|Banana]] ([[User talk:Banana|talk]]) 06:05, 16 February 2026 (UTC) | ||
== Changing Flock Safety archive links == | |||
[[Flock Safety]] is specifically excluded from the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine, as I noted on its talk page [[Talk:Flock_Safety#A_note_on_archiving_links|back in January]]. Your bot will have to use a different archival service for that page. — [[User:Sojourna|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna|talk]]) 05:24, 23 February 2026 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:24, 23 February 2026
About the CRWCitationBot
It's a minor thing, but something that could be irritating to future editors is that the bot is adding a duplicate |url-status field to the citations it's modifying. Just something to keep in mind. — Sojourna (talk) 05:23, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- Will check it out. I’m currently working on improving it and some pages vary from others really much. I plan to make sure all data is filled, than all data is same, and then fit it to needs of everyone. Will take few days to make it run properly, right now it was article by article with lots of manual checks. Bet I could just miss it, but thanks a lot for pointing this out Banana (talk) 05:56, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- okay, found issue and fixed it, wil lrun a job to clean up all citations with duplications Banana (talk) 06:05, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
Changing Flock Safety archive links
Flock Safety is specifically excluded from the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine, as I noted on its talk page back in January. Your bot will have to use a different archival service for that page. — Sojourna (talk) 05:24, 23 February 2026 (UTC)