Subway: Difference between revisions
m draft |
savin time |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
{{Ph-C-Int}} | {{Ph-C-Int}} | ||
[[wikipedia:Subway_(restaurant)|Subway IP LLC]] | [[wikipedia:Subway_(restaurant)|Subway IP LLC]] s a | ||
==Consumer-impact summary== | ==Consumer-impact summary== | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==Incidents== | ==Incidents== | ||
This is a list of all consumer-protection incidents this company is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the [[:Category:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|{{PAGENAME}} category]]. | This is a list of all consumer-protection incidents this company is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the [[:Category:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|{{PAGENAME}} category]]. | ||
===Hepatitis found in Subway | ===Hepatitis found in Subway=== | ||
{{Main|link to the main CR Wiki article}} | {{Main|link to the main CR Wiki article}} | ||
Short summary of the incident (could be the same as the summary preceding the article). | Short summary of the incident (could be the same as the summary preceding the article). | ||
=== Footlong aren't really a foot long === | ===Footlong aren't really a foot long=== | ||
hah get it! | hah get it! | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/closed-settlements/subway-footlong-sandwich-class-action-settlement/ | https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/closed-settlements/subway-footlong-sandwich-class-action-settlement/ | ||
===Product not completely tuna=== | |||
=== Product not completely tuna === | |||
https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/consumer-products/food/subway-urges-judge-to-toss-tuna-sandwich-class-action/ | https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/consumer-products/food/subway-urges-judge-to-toss-tuna-sandwich-class-action/ | ||
https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/consumer-products/food/subway-tuna-lawsuit-dismissed-but-plaintiffs-can-file-again-judge-says/ | https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/consumer-products/food/subway-tuna-lawsuit-dismissed-but-plaintiffs-can-file-again-judge-says/ | ||
=== Credit Card Information Showing on Customers Receipts === | ===Credit Card Information Showing on Customers Receipts=== | ||
https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/class-action-settlement-checks-mailed/subway-credit-card-receipts-settlement-checks-mailed/ | https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/class-action-settlement-checks-mailed/subway-credit-card-receipts-settlement-checks-mailed/ | ||
https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/closed-settlements/subway-credit-card-receipt-class-action-settlement/ | https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/closed-settlements/subway-credit-card-receipt-class-action-settlement/ | ||
===Unsolicited Text=== | https://www.classaction.org/news/purchase-of-turkey-salad-leads-to-facta-class-action-against-subway | ||
https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/tcpa/arbitration-not-an-option-for-subway-unwanted-texts-class-action-lawsuit/ | |||
===Unsolicited Text History === | |||
in April 2019, subway was sued by Marina Soliman for repeatedly sending promotional advertisements even after responding stop. She claimed that through use of an automatic dialing system containing a list of phone numbers from customers, it constitutes as a violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Smith |first=Anna |date=19 July 2022 |title=Subway class action over unsolicited spam texts dismissed |url=https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/tcpa/arbitration-not-an-option-for-subway-unwanted-texts-class-action-lawsuit/ |url-status=live |access-date=10 March 2026 |website=Top Class Action}}</ref> The case was dismissed on July 18, 2022, claiming the Telephone Consumer Protection Act applies to randomly or sequentially generated phone numbers systems and "artificial or prerecorded voices" doesn't apply to text messages.<ref>{{Cite web |date=10 May 2024 |title=UNITED STATES C OURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND C IRCUIT |url=https://www.consumerfinancialserviceslawmonitor.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/880/2024/05/Soliman-v.-Subway-Franchisee-Advertising-Trust-opinion.pdf |url-status=live |access-date=10 March 2026 |website=Lawmonitor}}</ref> | |||
In 2019, Malka Fishman sued Subway and T-mobile for allegedly sending messages using automatic telephone dialing system from T-Mobile that contains Subway/T-Mobile promotional advertising. She claims she gave consent to receiving text messages from T-Mobile regarding its wireless telephone services, however she gave the company no consent towards receiving advertisement messages from subway. The court granted motion to allow for dismissal regarding several claims made by the plantiff Malka Fishman; | |||
* Subway is found liable for sending messages via Automatic telephone dialing system<blockquote>"Fishman alleges that Subway controlled the content and timing of the message, and T-Mobile acted on behalf of Subway, the Court finds that Fishman plausibly pleads an agency relationship between Subway and T-Mobile"</blockquote> | |||
* T-Mobile was found to have an relationship with Subway | |||
* | |||
* Declared that Subway didn't send the messages, instead it was handled by T-mobile<blockquote>"Though Fishman asserts that any objective recipient of [the Text Message] would reasonably believe that T-Mobile had authority to act for Subway,” Fishman fails to allege Subway made any direct statements to him indicating its grant of authority to T-Mobile."</blockquote> | |||
https:// | In 2021, Ryan Turizo filed a lawsuit against Subway for violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and Florida Telephone Solicitation Act by sending text messages to customers without given consent via an computer automotive system. <ref>{{Cite web |date=24 May 2022 |title=Subway Class Action Alleges Sandwich Maker Sends Unsolicited Promotional Texts |url=https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/tcpa/subway-class-action-alleges-sandwich-maker-sends-unsolicited-promotional-texts/ |url-status=live |access-date=10 March 2026 |website=Top Class Action}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=10 March 2026 |title=Turizo v. Subway Franchisee Adver. Fund Trust Ltd. |url=https://case-law.vlex.com/vid/turizo-v-subway-franchisee-930411339 |url-status=live |access-date=10 March 2026 |website=vLex}}</ref>The case is still ongoing as of March. | ||
https:// | ===Giving less meat than advertised to customers=== | ||
On October 28, 2024, Anna Tollison filed a lawsuit against Subway for engaging in deceptive marketing practices that advertised the product Steak & Cheese sandwich containing 200% more meat than customers received.<ref>{{Cite web |date=28 October 2024 |title=IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK |url=https://www.classaction.org/media/tollison-v-subway-restaurants-inc-et-al.pdf |url-status=live |access-date=10 March 2026 |website=ClassAction}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=30 October 2024 |title=Subway sandwiches are short on meat, lawsuit claims |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/subway-sandwiches-short-meat-lawsuit-claims-rcna177921 |url-status=live |access-date=10 March 2026 |website=NBC News}}</ref> As of March 2026, the lawsuit is still ongoing. | |||
[[File:Subway Steak & Cheese Advertisement .png|thumb|Subway Steak & Cheese Advertisement ]] | |||
[[File:Subway actual Steak & Cheese Received.png|thumb|Subway actual Steak & Cheese Received]] | |||
==Products== | ==Products== | ||
| Line 58: | Line 63: | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
* [[McDonald's]] | *[[McDonald's]] | ||
* [[Arby's]] | *[[Arby's]] | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 02:24, 11 March 2026
| Basic information | |
|---|---|
| Founded | 1965-08-28 |
| Legal Structure | Private |
| Industry | Food |
| Also known as | |
| Official website | https://www.subway.com/en-us |
Subway IP LLC s a
Consumer-impact summary
Incidents
This is a list of all consumer-protection incidents this company is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the Subway category.
Hepatitis found in Subway
- Main article: link to the main CR Wiki article
Short summary of the incident (could be the same as the summary preceding the article).
Footlong aren't really a foot long
hah get it!
https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/lawsuit-news/subway-footlong-class-action-lawsuit/
Product not completely tuna
Credit Card Information Showing on Customers Receipts
https://www.classaction.org/news/purchase-of-turkey-salad-leads-to-facta-class-action-against-subway
Unsolicited Text History
in April 2019, subway was sued by Marina Soliman for repeatedly sending promotional advertisements even after responding stop. She claimed that through use of an automatic dialing system containing a list of phone numbers from customers, it constitutes as a violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.[2] The case was dismissed on July 18, 2022, claiming the Telephone Consumer Protection Act applies to randomly or sequentially generated phone numbers systems and "artificial or prerecorded voices" doesn't apply to text messages.[3]
In 2019, Malka Fishman sued Subway and T-mobile for allegedly sending messages using automatic telephone dialing system from T-Mobile that contains Subway/T-Mobile promotional advertising. She claims she gave consent to receiving text messages from T-Mobile regarding its wireless telephone services, however she gave the company no consent towards receiving advertisement messages from subway. The court granted motion to allow for dismissal regarding several claims made by the plantiff Malka Fishman;
- Subway is found liable for sending messages via Automatic telephone dialing system
"Fishman alleges that Subway controlled the content and timing of the message, and T-Mobile acted on behalf of Subway, the Court finds that Fishman plausibly pleads an agency relationship between Subway and T-Mobile"
- T-Mobile was found to have an relationship with Subway
- Declared that Subway didn't send the messages, instead it was handled by T-mobile
"Though Fishman asserts that any objective recipient of [the Text Message] would reasonably believe that T-Mobile had authority to act for Subway,” Fishman fails to allege Subway made any direct statements to him indicating its grant of authority to T-Mobile."
In 2021, Ryan Turizo filed a lawsuit against Subway for violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and Florida Telephone Solicitation Act by sending text messages to customers without given consent via an computer automotive system. [4][5]The case is still ongoing as of March.
Giving less meat than advertised to customers
On October 28, 2024, Anna Tollison filed a lawsuit against Subway for engaging in deceptive marketing practices that advertised the product Steak & Cheese sandwich containing 200% more meat than customers received.[6][7] As of March 2026, the lawsuit is still ongoing.
Products
See also
References
- ↑ ref goes here
- ↑ Smith, Anna (19 July 2022). "Subway class action over unsolicited spam texts dismissed". Top Class Action. Retrieved 10 March 2026.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ↑ "UNITED STATES C OURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND C IRCUIT" (PDF). Lawmonitor. 10 May 2024. Retrieved 10 March 2026.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ↑ "Subway Class Action Alleges Sandwich Maker Sends Unsolicited Promotional Texts". Top Class Action. 24 May 2022. Retrieved 10 March 2026.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ↑ "Turizo v. Subway Franchisee Adver. Fund Trust Ltd". vLex. 10 March 2026. Retrieved 10 March 2026.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ↑ "IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK" (PDF). ClassAction. 28 October 2024. Retrieved 10 March 2026.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ↑ "Subway sandwiches are short on meat, lawsuit claims". NBC News. 30 October 2024. Retrieved 10 March 2026.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)