User:Rudxain: Difference between revisions
link to "hidden EULA lang" |
JS article has been created! |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[https://rudxain.github.io/ Website] (includes contact info and bio). Note: The entire domain is a [https://docs.github.com/en/pages GH-Pages] site (see [[GitHub|GH]]), which is likely hosted on [[Cloudflare|CloudFlare]]'s servers. Most pages in the domain are <code>noscript</code>-friendly, though. | [https://rudxain.github.io/ Website] (includes contact info and bio). Note: The entire domain is a [https://docs.github.com/en/pages GH-Pages] site (see [[GitHub|GH]]), which is likely hosted on [[Cloudflare|CloudFlare]]'s servers. Most pages in the domain are <code>noscript</code>-friendly, though. | ||
I believe [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md my proposal for human-friendly contracts] is relevant for the CRW (possibly [[Hidden EULA language#Resources|there]]?). See [https://discord.com/channels/1324835844812443810/1324835844812443813/1476657529999065250 this message]:<blockquote>I've posted [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md this proposal for human-friendly contracts] a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems</blockquote> | |||
Revision as of 06:11, 18 March 2026
Website (includes contact info and bio). Note: The entire domain is a GH-Pages site (see GH), which is likely hosted on CloudFlare's servers. Most pages in the domain are noscript-friendly, though.
I believe my proposal for human-friendly contracts is relevant for the CRW (possibly there?). See this message:
I've posted this proposal for human-friendly contracts a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems