User:Rudxain: Difference between revisions
link to my OTM |
link my permacomputing page |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
You might also be interested in my | You might also be interested in my | ||
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20260420215524/https://github.com/Rudxain/RX-wiki/blob/main/wiki/Crap_inhibitors.md "Crap inhibitors" article] (archived, because [https://github.com/Rudxain/Rudxain.github.io/issues/17 this]) | *[https://web.archive.org/web/20260420215524/https://github.com/Rudxain/RX-wiki/blob/main/wiki/Crap_inhibitors.md "Crap inhibitors" article] (archived, because [https://github.com/Rudxain/Rudxain.github.io/issues/17 this]) | ||
* [[User:Rudxain/Object transparency movement|Product transparency proposal]] | *[[User:Rudxain/Object transparency movement|Product transparency proposal]] | ||
*[[User:Rudxain/Permacomputing|Permacomputing page]] | |||
BTW, I believe [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md my proposal for human-friendly contracts] is relevant for the CRW (possibly [[Hidden EULA language#Resources|there]]?). See [https://discord.com/channels/1324835844812443810/1324835844812443813/1476657529999065250 this message]:<blockquote>I've posted [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md this proposal for human-friendly contracts] a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems</blockquote> | BTW, I believe [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md my proposal for human-friendly contracts] is relevant for the CRW (possibly [[Hidden EULA language#Resources|there]]?). See [https://discord.com/channels/1324835844812443810/1324835844812443813/1476657529999065250 this message]:<blockquote>I've posted [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md this proposal for human-friendly contracts] a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems</blockquote> | ||
Latest revision as of 06:59, 26 April 2026
Website (includes contact info and bio). Note: The domain is a GH-Pages site. Most pages in the domain are noscript-friendly, though.
If you're looking for a Linux article, see my page on Unix.
You might also be interested in my
- "Crap inhibitors" article (archived, because this)
- Product transparency proposal
- Permacomputing page
BTW, I believe my proposal for human-friendly contracts is relevant for the CRW (possibly there?). See this message:
I've posted this proposal for human-friendly contracts a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems