Talk:Native Instruments is in preliminary insolvency: Difference between revisions
Add topicLatest comment: Yesterday at 05:10 by Sojourna in topic Deletion
→Deletion: Reply |
→Deletion: Reply |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:I think it could be deleted [[User:Andrew V|Andrew V]] ([[User talk:Andrew V|talk]]) 03:54, 28 April 2026 (UTC) | :I think it could be deleted [[User:Andrew V|Andrew V]] ([[User talk:Andrew V|talk]]) 03:54, 28 April 2026 (UTC) | ||
::I agree. Waiting four days has been time enough to give everyone a chance to respond. — [[User:Sojourna|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna|talk]]) 05:10, 28 April 2026 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 05:10, 28 April 2026
Deletion
[edit source]This has been marked as {{Irrelevant}} long enough, so let's go into why this should be deleted.
- No clear relation to CRW's mission.
- Citations that are not placed next to the related information.
- The user who created this article, @ELZURIX, has not returned since (see here). Their stated intentions would have been helpful, especially on the challenged relevancy.
- The amount of information is less than helpful and if I were a random visitor to the wiki, I'd be miffed at being tricked into believing that there was truly something to be found here.
- This can affect perception of the wiki itself regardless of the quality of other articles — one typically does not go to a wiki just to browse.
Any other thoughts? — Sojourna (talk) 01:54, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
- I think it could be deleted Andrew V (talk) 03:54, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
- I agree. Waiting four days has been time enough to give everyone a chance to respond. — Sojourna (talk) 05:10, 28 April 2026 (UTC)