Magnuson–Moss Warranty Act: Difference between revisions
m →History of Enforcement: de italicized quotation in accordance with guidelines |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Toyota held labile for all damages in used car's in-warranty repair case - June 16, 1992. <ref name=":0">https://law.justia.com/cases/north-carolina/court-of-appeals/1992/9110dc643-1.html</ref> | Toyota held labile for all damages in used car's in-warranty repair case - June 16, 1992. <ref name=":0">https://law.justia.com/cases/north-carolina/court-of-appeals/1992/9110dc643-1.html</ref> | ||
" | "Due to the purchase of the subject vehicle in used `as is' condition, the Defendant (toyota) dealer assumed and bore no responsibility for subsequent repair of the vehicle or its road worthiness. " the plaintiff (vehicle owner) was found to be correct and the defendant (toyota) was found liable for damages plaintiff (vehicle owner) suffered as a result of that violation<ref name=":0" /> | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||