Talk:Android Developer Verification: Difference between revisions
→Questionable edit from March 2026: new section |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Zscaler ThreatLabz Android malware report == | ==Zscaler ThreatLabz Android malware report== | ||
There is a [https://ir.zscaler.com/news-releases/news-release-details/zscaler-threatlabz-reveals-67-jump-android-malware-and-40-iot report] that says that Google Play has a 67% year-over-year increase in Android malware transactions. I'd expect there to be comments pointing out the hypocracy of malware of their app distribution service and how identifocation simply isn't an effective method. [[Special:Contributions/2A00:23C8:2384:101:CE0:32B6:5924:CC90|2A00:23C8:2384:101:CE0:32B6:5924:CC90]] 10:14, 10 November 2025 (UTC) | There is a [https://ir.zscaler.com/news-releases/news-release-details/zscaler-threatlabz-reveals-67-jump-android-malware-and-40-iot report] that says that Google Play has a 67% year-over-year increase in Android malware transactions. I'd expect there to be comments pointing out the hypocracy of malware of their app distribution service and how identifocation simply isn't an effective method. [[Special:Contributions/2A00:23C8:2384:101:CE0:32B6:5924:CC90|2A00:23C8:2384:101:CE0:32B6:5924:CC90]] 10:14, 10 November 2025 (UTC) | ||
== reset | ==reset== | ||
Samsung [[User:Md Rai|Md Rai]] ([[User talk:Md Rai|talk]]) 15:21, 5 April 2026 (UTC) | Samsung [[User:Md Rai|Md Rai]] ([[User talk:Md Rai|talk]]) 15:21, 5 April 2026 (UTC) | ||
== Questionable edit from March 2026 == | ==Questionable edit from March 2026== | ||
Tagging @[[User:JodyBruchonFan|JodyBruchonFan]] while here, since your edit reason prompted me to take a closer look. | Tagging @[[User:JodyBruchonFan|JodyBruchonFan]] while here, since your edit reason prompted me to take a closer look. | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Both instances occurred before I was made a moderator on March 30, which is why I'm only noticing this now. I'll work on undoing the damage and, if this sort of thing happens again, it may be worthwhile to semi-protect the page. — [[User:Sojourna|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna|talk]]) 23:13, 8 June 2026 (UTC) | Both instances occurred before I was made a moderator on March 30, which is why I'm only noticing this now. I'll work on undoing the damage and, if this sort of thing happens again, it may be worthwhile to semi-protect the page. — [[User:Sojourna|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna|talk]]) 23:13, 8 June 2026 (UTC) | ||
:The damage wasn't as bad as it initially appeared; I only needed to re-add the incident cargo (though that's also a topic I mean to bring up separately). So instead, I spent some hours combing through and cleaning up the article page. — [[User:Sojourna|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna|talk]]) 05:36, 9 June 2026 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:36, 9 June 2026
Zscaler ThreatLabz Android malware report
There is a report that says that Google Play has a 67% year-over-year increase in Android malware transactions. I'd expect there to be comments pointing out the hypocracy of malware of their app distribution service and how identifocation simply isn't an effective method. 2A00:23C8:2384:101:CE0:32B6:5924:CC90 10:14, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
reset
Samsung Md Rai (talk) 15:21, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
Questionable edit from March 2026
Tagging @JodyBruchonFan while here, since your edit reason prompted me to take a closer look.
I found this edit made on March 23, 2026, where the user explained it was to fix a typo... but had removed four citations, unlinked words in a couple instances, and deleted the incident cargo itself. They have made no other contribution since.
Going a bit further back, a very similar IP address using the exact same reason had also made an edit on March 17, 2026, where they had removed the incident cargo and entire paragraphs. No spamming, self-promoting, or trying to re-frame the narrative. Just removing content and not being honest about why.
Both instances occurred before I was made a moderator on March 30, which is why I'm only noticing this now. I'll work on undoing the damage and, if this sort of thing happens again, it may be worthwhile to semi-protect the page. — Sojourna (talk) 23:13, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
- The damage wasn't as bad as it initially appeared; I only needed to re-add the incident cargo (though that's also a topic I mean to bring up separately). So instead, I spent some hours combing through and cleaning up the article page. — Sojourna (talk) 05:36, 9 June 2026 (UTC)