Mozilla: Difference between revisions
TasmanianRex (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
→Alternatives: Added mention of BetterBird as Thunderbird alternative |
||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
The investment income comes from three primary sources: | The investment income comes from three primary sources: | ||
* '''Publicly traded securities & other investments''': Mozilla maintains a portfolio of investments that generate annual returns. | *'''Publicly traded securities & other investments''': Mozilla maintains a portfolio of investments that generate annual returns. | ||
* '''Program-related investments & royalties''': The Foundation earned '''$18,639,553''' in royalties from licensing its intellectual property to support open-source projects.<ref>[https://wiki.rossmanngroup.com/wiki/File:501c3_2023_990_Mozilla_Foundation_-_Full_Filing_-_Nonprofit_Explorer_-_ProPublica.pdf Mozilla Foundation 2023 Form 990]</ref> | *'''Program-related investments & royalties''': The Foundation earned '''$18,639,553''' in royalties from licensing its intellectual property to support open-source projects.<ref>[https://wiki.rossmanngroup.com/wiki/File:501c3_2023_990_Mozilla_Foundation_-_Full_Filing_-_Nonprofit_Explorer_-_ProPublica.pdf Mozilla Foundation 2023 Form 990]</ref> | ||
* '''Dividends and interest''': Mozilla also earns investment income from dividend-paying stocks and interest-bearing assets. | *'''Dividends and interest''': Mozilla also earns investment income from dividend-paying stocks and interest-bearing assets. | ||
Mozilla's reliance on investment income rather than direct contributions has raised questions about how responsive Mozilla Foundation is to the viability & market share of Mozilla software & its mission, given its ability to survive & continue paying high executive compensation regardless of whether work towards the core mission is being performed in a competent fashion. | Mozilla's reliance on investment income rather than direct contributions has raised questions about how responsive Mozilla Foundation is to the viability & market share of Mozilla software & its mission, given its ability to survive & continue paying high executive compensation regardless of whether work towards the core mission is being performed in a competent fashion. | ||
Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
Completely free alternative browsers are currently under active development, some of which show promise to become viable truly independent open source browser engines in the forseeable future. These include the [https://ladybird.org/ Ladybird] browser initiated by SerenityOS creator Andreas Kling. | Completely free alternative browsers are currently under active development, some of which show promise to become viable truly independent open source browser engines in the forseeable future. These include the [https://ladybird.org/ Ladybird] browser initiated by SerenityOS creator Andreas Kling. | ||
As for Thunderbird, some open source soft forks such as [https://www.betterbird.eu/ BetterBird] are available. | |||
==References== | ==References== |