Pinterest: Difference between revisions

Emanuele (talk | contribs)
slight tone change
Line 3: Line 3:
| Type =Public
| Type =Public
| Founded =2009
| Founded =2009
| Industry =Social media
| Industry =Social media service
| Official Website =pinterest.com
| Official Website =https://pinterest.com/
| Logo =Pinterest Logo.png
| Logo =Pinterest Logo.png
}}Pinterest is a photo hosting service and company started by Ben Silbermann, Paul Sciarra, and Evan Sharp in December 2009. It was initially intended to function as a digital version of traditional catalogs, however it transitioned to being an image host shortly after.<ref>https://www.fastcompany.com/3001984/pinterest-pivot</ref>  
}}'''[[wikipedia:Pinterest|Pinterest]]''' is a photo hosting service and company started by Ben Silbermann, Paul Sciarra, and Evan Sharp in December 2009. It was initially intended to function as a digital version of traditional catalogs, however it transitioned to being an image host shortly after.<ref>https://www.fastcompany.com/3001984/pinterest-pivot</ref>  


==Consumer impact summary==
==Consumer impact summary==
User freedom: Absolute; content is rarely taken down unless mass-reported.
User privacy: Questionable; private boards can be accessed by staff.
Business model: Profits off of affiliate links and advertisements.
Market control: Dominant; overrides original sources in image searches.<ref name=":0">http://www.dailydot.com/business/print-erest-printerest-pinterest-response/</ref><ref name=":1">https://discover.hubpages.com/technology/Is-Pinterest-a-Haven-for-Copyright-Violations<!-- Note: Source published first in 2012, earliest mention of licensing of pinned content in comments is 2013, and last edit was 2016. -->


* '''User freedom''': Absolute; content is rarely taken down unless mass-reported.
* '''User privacy''': Questionable; private boards can be accessed by staff.
* '''Business model''': Profits off of affiliate links and advertisements.
* '''Market control''': Dominant; overrides original sources in image searches.<ref name=":0">http://www.dailydot.com/business/print-erest-printerest-pinterest-response/</ref><ref name=":1">https://discover.hubpages.com/technology/Is-Pinterest-a-Haven-for-Copyright-Violations<!-- Note: Source published first in 2012, earliest mention of licensing of pinned content in comments is 2013, and last edit was 2016. -->
</ref>
</ref>


Line 22: Line 19:
This is a list of all consumer protection incidents this company is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the [[:Category:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|{{PAGENAME}} category]].
This is a list of all consumer protection incidents this company is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the [[:Category:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|{{PAGENAME}} category]].


=== Training of AI based on user-submitted content (2025) ===
===Training of AI based on user-submitted content (2025)===
  Further Reading: [[Nonconsensual scraping]]
  Further Reading: [[Nonconsensual scraping]]
In March of 2025, Pinterest updated their TOS<ref name=":2">https://policy.pinterest.com/en/privacy-policy-preview</ref> to include a new clause which states<blockquote>Improve the products and services of our family of companies and offer new features. For example, using information to train, develop and improve our technology such as our machine learning models, regardless of when Pins were posted. This includes, for example, Pinterest’s body type technology, which is trained on images in Pins posted to our Services.</blockquote>The vagueness of this new clause rightfully brings concern,<ref>{{Cite news |last=Harrison |first=Maggie |date=Mar 8, 2025 |title=Pinterest Changes User Terms So It Can Train AI on User Data and Photos, Regardless of When They Were Posted |url=https://futurism.com/pinterest-data-photos-train-ai |access-date=Mar 10, 2025 |work=Futurism}}</ref> as Pinterest has been well-known to host stolen content.<ref>https://www.reddit.com/r/Pinterest/comments/vuns1z/people_are_stealing_my_photos_what_can_i_do/</ref><ref>https://www.reddit.com/r/Pinterest/comments/183gceg/help_how_do_i_report_stolen_pins/</ref><ref>https://brandingforsmes.com/dealing-with-stolen-pinterest-pins-or-blog-content-a-guide-for-content-creators/</ref> This essentially means that the works any consumer has made can, and likely has been scraped against their request for the sake of training AI, which could train Pinterest's own AI models, or sell this content as training data to other companies that may wish to train their own AI models.  
In March of 2025, Pinterest updated their TOS<ref name=":2">https://policy.pinterest.com/en/privacy-policy-preview</ref> to include a new clause which states:<blockquote>Improve the products and services of our family of companies and offer new features. For example, using information to train, develop and improve our technology such as our machine learning models, regardless of when Pins were posted. This includes, for example, Pinterest’s body type technology, which is trained on images in Pins posted to our Services.</blockquote>The vagueness of this new clause rightfully brings concern,<ref>{{Cite news |last=Harrison |first=Maggie |date=Mar 8, 2025 |title=Pinterest Changes User Terms So It Can Train AI on User Data and Photos, Regardless of When They Were Posted |url=https://futurism.com/pinterest-data-photos-train-ai |access-date=Mar 10, 2025 |work=Futurism}}</ref> as Pinterest has been well-known to host stolen content.<ref>https://www.reddit.com/r/Pinterest/comments/vuns1z/people_are_stealing_my_photos_what_can_i_do/</ref><ref>https://www.reddit.com/r/Pinterest/comments/183gceg/help_how_do_i_report_stolen_pins/</ref><ref>https://brandingforsmes.com/dealing-with-stolen-pinterest-pins-or-blog-content-a-guide-for-content-creators/</ref> This suggests that user-generated works may have been collected and used for AI training purposes without explicit consent. Such data could be utilized to train Pinterest's own AI models or sold as training data to other companies developing AI technologies.  


=== Exploitation of pinned images (circa 2012) ===
===Exploitation of pinned images (circa 2012)===
As content from creators are nonconsensually "pinned" to the platform, since 2012,<ref name=":1" /> if not earlier, Pinterest claims rights inside its TOS<ref name=":2" /><ref>Kalliopi Monoyios (March 19, 2012). "[http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/symbiartic/2012/03/19/pinterests-terms-of-service-word-by-terrifying-word/ Pinterest's Terms of Service, Word by Terrifying Word]". ''Scientific American''. [https://web.archive.org/web/20120523164313/http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/symbiartic/2012/03/19/pinterests-terms-of-service-word-by-terrifying-word/ Archived] from the original on May 23, 2012. Retrieved March 10, 2025.</ref> to<blockquote>By making available any Member Content through the Site, Application or Services, you hereby grant to Cold Brew Labs a worldwide, irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, royalty-free license, with the right to sublicense, to use, copy, adapt, *modify, distribute, license, sell, transfer, publicly display, publicly perform, transmit, stream, broadcast, access, view, and otherwise exploit such Member Content only on, through or by means of the Site, Application or Services.</blockquote>In layman's terms, this means any content uploaded to Pinterest can be freely used in any shape or form by the platform and anyone who happens to aimlessly scroll it. Connecting back to the nonconsensual posting of this content, this means that creators could and historically have had their content overridden<ref name=":0" /> in search feeds and copyrights overridden for malicious purposes by other publishers.<ref name=":0" />
As content from creators are nonconsensually "pinned" to the platform, since 2012,<ref name=":1" /> if not earlier, Pinterest claims rights inside its TOS<ref name=":2" /><ref>Kalliopi Monoyios (March 19, 2012). "[http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/symbiartic/2012/03/19/pinterests-terms-of-service-word-by-terrifying-word/ Pinterest's Terms of Service, Word by Terrifying Word]". ''Scientific American''. [https://web.archive.org/web/20120523164313/http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/symbiartic/2012/03/19/pinterests-terms-of-service-word-by-terrifying-word/ Archived] from the original on May 23, 2012. Retrieved March 10, 2025.</ref> to:<blockquote>By making available any Member Content through the Site, Application or Services, you hereby grant to Cold Brew Labs a worldwide, irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, royalty-free license, with the right to sublicense, to use, copy, adapt, *modify, distribute, license, sell, transfer, publicly display, publicly perform, transmit, stream, broadcast, access, view, and otherwise exploit such Member Content only on, through or by means of the Site, Application or Services.</blockquote>In simpler terms, this means that any content uploaded to Pinterest can be freely utilized by the platform and its users in any manner. Given the platform's history of hosting content without explicit consent, this raises concerns that creators' works may be overridden in search feeds<ref name=":0" /> and copyrights overridden for unauthorized purposes by other publishers.<ref name=":0" />


==See also==
==See also==
[[DeviantArt]]
 
* [[DeviantArt]]


==References==
==References==
Line 36: Line 34:


[[Category:{{PAGENAME}}]]
[[Category:{{PAGENAME}}]]
[[Category:Pinterest]]