Netgate: Difference between revisions
fixed all references formatting |
TasmanianRex (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
====Consumer and Licensing Changes==== | ====Consumer and Licensing Changes==== | ||
In a controversial decision, Netgate discontinued free access to pfSense Home+ Lab<ref>{{Cite web |date=26 Oct 2023 |title=Addressing Changes to pfSense Plus Home+Lab |url=https://www.netgate.com/blog/addressing-changes-to-pfsense-plus-homelab |url-status=live |access-date=22 Mar 2025 |website=[[Netgate]]}}</ref> | In a controversial decision, Netgate discontinued free access to pfSense Home+ Lab,<ref>{{Cite web |date=26 Oct 2023 |title=Addressing Changes to pfSense Plus Home+Lab |url=https://www.netgate.com/blog/addressing-changes-to-pfsense-plus-homelab |url-status=live |access-date=22 Mar 2025 |website=[[Netgate]]}}</ref> a version previously available at no cost, requiring users to migrate to CE or a paid model. This change was made without prior notice, leading to criticism from the community. | ||
====Security Concerns with WireGuard Implementation==== | ====Security Concerns with WireGuard Implementation==== | ||
In 2021, Jason Donenfeld, the creator of WireGuard, reviewed pfSense’s WireGuard implementation and identified multiple security flaws<ref>{{Cite web |last=Thompson |first=Jim |date=18 Mar 2021 |title=WireGuard Removed from pfSense® CE and pfSense® Plus Software |url=https://www.netgate.com/blog/wireguard-removed-from-pfsense-ce-and-pfsense-plus-software |url-status=live |access-date=22 Mar 2025 |website=[[Netgate]]}}</ref> | In 2021, Jason Donenfeld, the creator of WireGuard, reviewed pfSense’s WireGuard implementation and identified multiple security flaws.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Thompson |first=Jim |date=18 Mar 2021 |title=WireGuard Removed from pfSense® CE and pfSense® Plus Software |url=https://www.netgate.com/blog/wireguard-removed-from-pfsense-ce-and-pfsense-plus-software |url-status=live |access-date=22 Mar 2025 |website=[[Netgate]]}}</ref> His review was highly critical, highlighting serious vulnerabilities that raised concerns about the security of Netgate's implementation. | ||
====Targeting other projects==== | ====Targeting other projects==== | ||
Netgate's co-founder has publicly criticized competing projects, including OPNsense, a fork of pfSense. OPNsense, which is endorsed by the developers of m0n0wall (the project from which pfSense originated), was also the target of a parody website<ref>{{Cite web |title=OPNSense |url=http://www.opnsense.com/ |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160314132836/http://www.opnsense.com/ |archive-date=14 Mar 2016 |access-date=22 Mar 2025 |website=}}</ref> allegedly created by Netgate. OPNsense had to file a complaint with the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) to gain control of the disputed domain<ref>{{Cite web |date=24 Nov 2017 |title=Netgate / pfSense acts in bad faith |url=https://opnsense.org/opnsense-com/ |url-status=live |access-date=22 Mar 2025 |website=[[OPNSense]]}}</ref> | Netgate's co-founder has publicly criticized competing projects, including OPNsense, a fork of pfSense. OPNsense, which is endorsed by the developers of m0n0wall (the project from which pfSense originated), was also the target of a parody website.<ref>{{Cite web |title=OPNSense |url=http://www.opnsense.com/ |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160314132836/http://www.opnsense.com/ |archive-date=14 Mar 2016 |access-date=22 Mar 2025 |website=}}</ref> allegedly created by Netgate. OPNsense had to file a complaint with the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) to gain control of the disputed domain.<ref>{{Cite web |date=24 Nov 2017 |title=Netgate / pfSense acts in bad faith |url=https://opnsense.org/opnsense-com/ |url-status=live |access-date=22 Mar 2025 |website=[[OPNSense]]}}</ref> | ||
==Incidents== | ==Incidents== | ||
Latest revision as of 09:56, 25 March 2025
| Basic information | |
|---|---|
| Founded | 2004 |
| Type | Private |
| Industry | Computer Hardware, Computer Software, Networking Equipment, Firewalls |
| Official website | https://www.netgate.com |
Netgate, officially Rubicon Communications (LLC), is an American technology company based in Austin, Texas. It is the owner and developer of the pfSense firewall project and other networking products.
Consumer impact summary[edit | edit source]
Relationship with the Open-Source Community[edit | edit source]
While Netgate has contributed to BSD, the operating system on which its firewall pfSense is based on, the company has been criticized in recent years for its stance toward the open-source community.
Consumer and Licensing Changes[edit | edit source]
In a controversial decision, Netgate discontinued free access to pfSense Home+ Lab,[1] a version previously available at no cost, requiring users to migrate to CE or a paid model. This change was made without prior notice, leading to criticism from the community.
Security Concerns with WireGuard Implementation[edit | edit source]
In 2021, Jason Donenfeld, the creator of WireGuard, reviewed pfSense’s WireGuard implementation and identified multiple security flaws.[2] His review was highly critical, highlighting serious vulnerabilities that raised concerns about the security of Netgate's implementation.
Targeting other projects[edit | edit source]
Netgate's co-founder has publicly criticized competing projects, including OPNsense, a fork of pfSense. OPNsense, which is endorsed by the developers of m0n0wall (the project from which pfSense originated), was also the target of a parody website.[3] allegedly created by Netgate. OPNsense had to file a complaint with the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) to gain control of the disputed domain.[4]
Incidents[edit | edit source]
This section is incomplete. This notice can be deleted once all the placeholder text has been replaced.
If the company page is short enough and/or the incident is not deserving of it own page, add incidents below in sub-sections (including the points outlined in Consumer_Action_Taskforce:Sample/Incident/Help) and delete the list at the end of this section.
If the company has various incidents listed and/or this page is getting too long, do not add sub-sections, and instead complete the following list:
This is a list of all consumer protection incidents this company is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the Netgate category.
- Example incident one (date):Short summary of the incident (could be the same as the summary preceding the article).
- Example incident two (date):
Products[edit | edit source]
This section is incomplete. This notice can be deleted once all the placeholder text has been replaced.
This is a list of the company's product lines with articles on this wiki.
- Example product line one (release date): Short summary of the product's incidents.
- Example product line two (release date):
See also[edit | edit source]
This section is incomplete. This notice can be deleted once all the placeholder text has been replaced.
Link to relevant theme articles or companies with similar incidents.
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ "Addressing Changes to pfSense Plus Home+Lab". Netgate. 26 Oct 2023. Retrieved 22 Mar 2025.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ↑ Thompson, Jim (18 Mar 2021). "WireGuard Removed from pfSense® CE and pfSense® Plus Software". Netgate. Retrieved 22 Mar 2025.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ↑ "OPNSense". Archived from the original on 14 Mar 2016. Retrieved 22 Mar 2025.
- ↑ "Netgate / pfSense acts in bad faith". OPNSense. 24 Nov 2017. Retrieved 22 Mar 2025.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)