Talk:South Eastern (train operating company): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
→Relevancy discussion: Reply |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Relevancy discussion == | ==Relevancy discussion== | ||
Hi, Just opening a discussion as to how well this article, and the incidents related to South Eastern, fit with the wiki's [[Mission statement|mission]] and [[Consumer Rights Wiki:Inclusion guidelines|inclusion criteria]] | Hi, Just opening a discussion as to how well this article, and the incidents related to South Eastern, fit with the wiki's [[Mission statement|mission]] and [[Consumer Rights Wiki:Inclusion guidelines|inclusion criteria]] | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Have added a relevancy notice, as the incidents listed appear to be as a result of incompetency or mismanagement, rather than malicious or large-scale anti-consumer behaviour. Assuming that refunds etc. were provided after these events, I'm not sure how they relate to the wiki? [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 10:36, 14 August 2025 (UTC) (Edited: unfucked the formatting) | Have added a relevancy notice, as the incidents listed appear to be as a result of incompetency or mismanagement, rather than malicious or large-scale anti-consumer behaviour. Assuming that refunds etc. were provided after these events, I'm not sure how they relate to the wiki? [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 10:36, 14 August 2025 (UTC) (Edited: unfucked the formatting) | ||
:Hello, honestly i totally agree with you on this now hearing your point of view. I wanted to experiment with making a page for a UK train company but to be honest i'm not really sure how well this fits either. We could just delete this from the wiki at this point. I could not find anything else to talk about beside the issues listed that were notable enough, so this might just be a useless article altogether. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|AnotherConsumerRightsPerson]] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 10:52, 14 August 2025 (UTC) | |||