Talk:Artificial intelligence: Difference between revisions
→Scope?: Reply |
→Scope?: AI as roadmap article |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
::- Liability (I'd say this can be relevant, but the emphasis should be placed on situations where people create systems using AI that take decisions that really shouldn't be left to AI, and harm consumers that way. This is always going to be a fuzzy line, and I'd expect extensive discussion over it - it feels analogous to the question of 'at what point does someone getting injured by their own chainsaw go from being manufacturer negligence, to user error?') | ::- Liability (I'd say this can be relevant, but the emphasis should be placed on situations where people create systems using AI that take decisions that really shouldn't be left to AI, and harm consumers that way. This is always going to be a fuzzy line, and I'd expect extensive discussion over it - it feels analogous to the question of 'at what point does someone getting injured by their own chainsaw go from being manufacturer negligence, to user error?') | ||
::More broadly, I think that 'AI' probably isn't the best title for an article, as it's such a wide field. AI technically includes almost anything done by a computer. If we go by dictionary definitions, the computer opponents in old strategy games would count as 'AI'. LLMs, Generative image/video models, and traditional ML stuff like image recognition are all distinct enough, and are related to different issues, that it feels like they'd be better separated into their own articles, rather than bundled. [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 16:04, 8 September 2025 (UTC) | ::More broadly, I think that 'AI' probably isn't the best title for an article, as it's such a wide field. AI technically includes almost anything done by a computer. If we go by dictionary definitions, the computer opponents in old strategy games would count as 'AI'. LLMs, Generative image/video models, and traditional ML stuff like image recognition are all distinct enough, and are related to different issues, that it feels like they'd be better separated into their own articles, rather than bundled. [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 16:04, 8 September 2025 (UTC) | ||
:::Since AI is so pervasive as a marketing term, I think it appropriate to have an article on it. If nothing else, to give an easy to find roadmap of other related articles that cover aspects. For example, I would not expect the layman to know what generative AI, or LLMs are - even if much of the content of concern here winds up under such sub-articles. | |||
:::I agree that subdivisiion probably makes sense. However, at this point I don't have a clear idea of what bits to split off. [[User:Drakeula|Drakeula]] ([[User talk:Drakeula|talk]]) 08:51, 13 September 2025 (UTC) | |||
==Appeal posted re proposed deletion== | ==Appeal posted re proposed deletion== | ||