Template talk:Citation needed: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Latest comment: 18 October 2025 by Keith in topic Add ‘nocat’ parameter to remove category
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:If you're referring to fact that this template connects to Articles in need of work, I have to agree. There are a lot of pages with only 1 or 2 of those that only need a small fix, yet get added in the same category with pages that might have a dozen or more. It seems overkill in my opinion, if an article is otherwise good quality. ButI can also see the argument for why it's added. | :If you're referring to fact that this template connects to Articles in need of work, I have to agree. There are a lot of pages with only 1 or 2 of those that only need a small fix, yet get added in the same category with pages that might have a dozen or more. It seems overkill in my opinion, if an article is otherwise good quality. ButI can also see the argument for why it's added. | ||
:@[[User:Mr Pollo|Mr Pollo]] @[[User:Keith|Keith]] pinging, since this was a recent change yall spoke about [[User:Beanie Bo|Beanie Bo]] ([[User talk:Beanie Bo|talk]]) 13:04, 18 October 2025 (UTC) | :@[[User:Mr Pollo|Mr Pollo]] @[[User:Keith|Keith]] pinging, since this was a recent change yall spoke about [[User:Beanie Bo|Beanie Bo]] ([[User talk:Beanie Bo|talk]]) 13:04, 18 October 2025 (UTC) | ||
::I mean, the articles in need of work is intended to be used for people who want to fix something, and are looking for articles to do it on - the category itself is not a warning to readers (that's the purpose intended to be filled by the notices), so I don't think we need to worry about the category negatively labelling the article. | |||
::I do agree though that if a user turns up after clicking on an 'article in need of work' article, they might be initially confused by what is actually meant to be wrong with an article that contains only a 'citation needed' thing somewhere on it. Might be worth implementing the option. Is this a protected template or can anyone edit it? i'd be happy for someone to have a go at implementing a nocat parameter, provided it doesn't break existing citation needed templates. [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 15:12, 18 October 2025 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:12, 18 October 2025
This works in most cases but sometimes it does not appear inline with text. Not sure if it breaks too much stuff but it should do for now Kostas
There is a problem rn on Post-purchase EULA modification with it inline. The second use of it causes all following text in the paragraph to be placed inside a quote block for some reason. Mingyee (talk) 10:48, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Adding paragraph tags tends to fix this but I still am unsure why it is behaving so erratically. Fixed on the eula page, thanks fo the link Kostas (talk) 10:48, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Add ‘nocat’ parameter to remove category
Hi, I don’t think this is implemented so I want to ask if you can add a nocat parameter to remove the category given by this. AnotherConsumerRightsPerson (talk) 06:55, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- If you're referring to fact that this template connects to Articles in need of work, I have to agree. There are a lot of pages with only 1 or 2 of those that only need a small fix, yet get added in the same category with pages that might have a dozen or more. It seems overkill in my opinion, if an article is otherwise good quality. ButI can also see the argument for why it's added.
- @Mr Pollo @Keith pinging, since this was a recent change yall spoke about Beanie Bo (talk) 13:04, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- I mean, the articles in need of work is intended to be used for people who want to fix something, and are looking for articles to do it on - the category itself is not a warning to readers (that's the purpose intended to be filled by the notices), so I don't think we need to worry about the category negatively labelling the article.
- I do agree though that if a user turns up after clicking on an 'article in need of work' article, they might be initially confused by what is actually meant to be wrong with an article that contains only a 'citation needed' thing somewhere on it. Might be worth implementing the option. Is this a protected template or can anyone edit it? i'd be happy for someone to have a go at implementing a nocat parameter, provided it doesn't break existing citation needed templates. Keith (talk) 15:12, 18 October 2025 (UTC)