Talk:Age verification: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 23 October 2025 by JamesTDG in topic Relevant examples
→Relevant examples: new section |
Addendum |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Reminder, this article's examples section needs to be relevant where consumers gave their ID to [x-service], and a privacy incident happened involving their ID. If you need an example of what NOT to include here, please read the following article: | Reminder, this article's examples section needs to be relevant where consumers gave their ID to [x-service], and a privacy incident happened involving their ID. If you need an example of what NOT to include here, please read the following article: | ||
https://www.thebeaconnewspapers.com/2-7-billion-ids-hacked-in-recent-breach/ [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 00:44, 23 October 2025 (UTC) | https://www.thebeaconnewspapers.com/2-7-billion-ids-hacked-in-recent-breach/ | ||
Additionally, please remember that services that make sense for requiring IDs, such as for handling legal or tax data, does not apply to this article. Their breaches however, may be relevant to the wiki, for example, the Equifax Breach of 2017. | |||
[[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 00:44, 23 October 2025 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:47, 23 October 2025
Relevant examples
Reminder, this article's examples section needs to be relevant where consumers gave their ID to [x-service], and a privacy incident happened involving their ID. If you need an example of what NOT to include here, please read the following article:
https://www.thebeaconnewspapers.com/2-7-billion-ids-hacked-in-recent-breach/
Additionally, please remember that services that make sense for requiring IDs, such as for handling legal or tax data, does not apply to this article. Their breaches however, may be relevant to the wiki, for example, the Equifax Breach of 2017.