Talk:Brother printers causing issues with third party inks: Difference between revisions
Add topicLatest comment: 23 October 2025 by 2A01:CB04:695:C700:AD7B:244C:35F4:9193 in topic On purpose sabotage
m Keith moved page Talk:Brother ink lockout & quality sabotage to Talk:Brother printers causing issues with third party inks: changed title for tone reasons. Maybe someone can think of a better one, but wanted to get the work 'sabotage' out |
→On purpose sabotage: new section |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[Special:Contributions/2603:8080:2B05:C434:D554:41BD:32DF:5582|2603:8080:2B05:C434:D554:41BD:32DF:5582]] | [[Special:Contributions/2603:8080:2B05:C434:D554:41BD:32DF:5582|2603:8080:2B05:C434:D554:41BD:32DF:5582]] | ||
:Whether they fix it or not this response warrants inclusion to the article in a "Brother's response" section. [[User:Kostas|Kostas]] ([[User talk:Kostas|talk]]) 08:00, 6 March 2025 (UTC) | :Whether they fix it or not this response warrants inclusion to the article in a "Brother's response" section. [[User:Kostas|Kostas]] ([[User talk:Kostas|talk]]) 08:00, 6 March 2025 (UTC) | ||
== On purpose sabotage == | |||
Guys, | |||
I've been invited by Brother in their HQs in France. Their engineers BOASTED in front of me they had decreased the minimal temperature needed for the ink to get liquid. As a result, third-party toners manufacturers' ink does not completely get liquid. This decreases the quality (you see stains) and finally breaks the printer fuser unit. This is very expensive. | |||
I'll never ever purchase a Brother again. [[Special:Contributions/2A01:CB04:695:C700:AD7B:244C:35F4:9193|2A01:CB04:695:C700:AD7B:244C:35F4:9193]] 13:13, 23 October 2025 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:13, 23 October 2025
Brother refutes saying these are false claims
[edit source]Brother claims this is false. I wonder whether they will fix firmware that confirms it's actually true? Hacker News discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43271507
2603:8080:2B05:C434:D554:41BD:32DF:5582
- Whether they fix it or not this response warrants inclusion to the article in a "Brother's response" section. Kostas (talk) 08:00, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
On purpose sabotage
[edit source]Guys,
I've been invited by Brother in their HQs in France. Their engineers BOASTED in front of me they had decreased the minimal temperature needed for the ink to get liquid. As a result, third-party toners manufacturers' ink does not completely get liquid. This decreases the quality (you see stains) and finally breaks the printer fuser unit. This is very expensive.
I'll never ever purchase a Brother again. 2A01:CB04:695:C700:AD7B:244C:35F4:9193 13:13, 23 October 2025 (UTC)