Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderators' noticeboard: Difference between revisions

@@ Line 298: / Line 298: @@
 :The "has not seen any use" bit is something I usually add to articles if it hasn't been edited, but there is no guideline on it. AIgen is shown to me partly because loads of info was suddenly added. I do have to admit though that it doesn't make much sense and if nothing happens to it in a year or 2 maybe it'll get deleted then? I'll remove the deletionreq. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|<i><b>AnotherConsumerRightsPerson</b></i>]] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 14:39, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
+::Thank you.
+::Not quite sure I understand what you are saying.  I thought the goal of the wiki was to have a reference.  Unfortunately, that entails a necessary evil of having to write/edit articles.  If an article is good enough that it hasn't required editing in months or years, isn't that a good thing?  (Not saying the article is great, but once something is sort of okay, editors might focus on more skeletal articles vs. polishing something that has the basics.)
+::Is there something undesirable about writing something offline, and then adding it?  I have been drafting a few things locally, it didn't occur to me that there would be anything suspicious or bad about crafting in private and then releasing what would look sudden to others.  Please help me understand.   [[User:Drakeula|Drakeula]] ([[User talk:Drakeula|talk]]) 18:54, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
 ==What does the AI/LLM template mean?==