Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderators' noticeboard: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 327: | Line 327: | ||
==[[Wikimedia Foundation]]== | ==[[Wikimedia Foundation]]== | ||
As far as things goes, there was a heated discussion about contents at [[Wikimedia Foundation]] where [[User:Beanie Bo]] insisted that many contents we've added are out of the scope, although later on some mods clarified on the Discord server that the so-called "name and shame" pages on Wikipedia do fall in the scope since they constitute privacy violations. But now Beanie Bo, who apparently is out of the loop from the Discord server discussion, had went against that consensus by removing the section about the privacy violations, while putting the page up for deletion which will mean the compromise of impartiality which wouldn't make a good look for Louis as he reportedly wants to present the findings to the Congress one day.[[Special:Contributions/15.181.161.29|15.181.161.29]] 14:22, 7 November 2025 (UTC) | As far as things goes, there was a heated discussion about contents at [[Wikimedia Foundation]] where [[User:Beanie Bo]] insisted that many contents we've added are out of the scope, although later on some mods clarified on the Discord server that the so-called "name and shame" pages on Wikipedia do fall in the scope since they constitute privacy violations. But now Beanie Bo, who apparently is out of the loop from the Discord server discussion, had went against that consensus by removing the section about the privacy violations, while putting the page up for deletion which will mean the compromise of impartiality which wouldn't make a good look for Louis as he reportedly wants to present the findings to the Congress one day. Pinging [[User:Keith]] and [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson]] for third opinions. [[Special:Contributions/15.181.161.29|15.181.161.29]] 14:22, 7 November 2025 (UTC) | ||