Talk:Google: Difference between revisions
→JS: Reply |
→JS: Reply |
||
| Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
:Seriously though, if it is actually necessary and there are reliable sources, then sure! [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 06:07, 14 November 2025 (UTC) | :Seriously though, if it is actually necessary and there are reliable sources, then sure! [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 06:07, 14 November 2025 (UTC) | ||
::lmao. yeah I agree. It's not that big of a deal. But it raises privacy and security concerns, and it's related to [[bloatware]]: | ::lmao. yeah I agree. It's not that big of a deal. But it raises privacy and security concerns, and it's related to [[bloatware]]: | ||
::* https://idlewords.com/talks/website_obesity.htm | ::*https://idlewords.com/talks/website_obesity.htm | ||
::* https://tonsky.me/blog/js-bloat | ::*https://tonsky.me/blog/js-bloat | ||
::[[User:Rudxain|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain|talk]]) 06:28, 14 November 2025 (UTC) | ::[[User:Rudxain|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain|talk]]) 06:28, 14 November 2025 (UTC) | ||
::BTW, I wrote an (unfinished) blog-post about this with 20+ sources: | |||
::* https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/post/js-abuse.md | |||
::* https://rudxain.github.io/blog/post/js-abuse | |||
::The 1st link [https://github.com/Rudxain/Rudxain.github.io/issues/17 will break]. | |||
::When the 2nd breaks, remove the "/post" part. | |||
::I'm posting both because the 1st one is "better" (for now) [[User:Rudxain|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain|talk]]) 22:01, 15 December 2025 (UTC) | |||
==G forces screen-saver to have privacy-policy; they get roasted instead== | ==G forces screen-saver to have privacy-policy; they get roasted instead== | ||