Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderators' noticeboard: Difference between revisions
→Article Relevance appeal: Reply |
SinexTitan (talk | contribs) →Article Relevance appeal: Reply |
||
| Line 185: | Line 185: | ||
:disregard the examples cuz I blurred the lines between consumer and human rights [[User:SinexTitan|SinexTitan]] ([[User talk:SinexTitan|talk]]) 19:13, 6 January 2026 (UTC) | :disregard the examples cuz I blurred the lines between consumer and human rights [[User:SinexTitan|SinexTitan]] ([[User talk:SinexTitan|talk]]) 19:13, 6 January 2026 (UTC) | ||
::I think we should have more discussion on that. Privacy and AI really don't mix and privacy with online ai like chatgpt is horrible, but that only applies to specific AI. I think it should be kept but it can be considered irrelevant because of that. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 19:18, 6 January 2026 (UTC) | ::I think we should have more discussion on that. Privacy and AI really don't mix and privacy with online ai like chatgpt is horrible, but that only applies to specific AI. I think it should be kept but it can be considered irrelevant because of that. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 19:18, 6 January 2026 (UTC) | ||
:::I see but it still kinda doesn't make sense to me but that doesn't matter. we're actively documenting how AI violates consumer rights with [[Palantir]] and [[Flock Safety]]. I'm also disregarding my earlier disregardation as we also have documented elements that might be argued is human rights. I get being focused in our mission but being so literal with something such as rights which's quite diverse and convoluted doesn't work [[User:SinexTitan|SinexTitan]] ([[User talk:SinexTitan|talk]]) 19:30, 6 January 2026 (UTC) | |||