Brilliant: Difference between revisions
Silk Weaver (talk | contribs) Attempted to optimize the language of the opening blurb at the top, mainly with additions to certain phrases. |
Bythmusters (talk | contribs) m Added Cargo template in place of Infobox |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Incomplete}} | {{Incomplete}} | ||
{{CompanyCargo | |||
{{ | |Description=American educational platform hosting interactive STEM modules. | ||
| | |Founded=2012 | ||
| | |Industry=Education | ||
| | |Logo=Brilliant logo.png | ||
| | |ParentCompany= | ||
| | |Type=Private | ||
|Website=https://brilliant.org | |||
}} | }} | ||
'''[[wikipedia:Brilliant_(website)|Brilliant]]''' (also known as '''Brilliant.org''') is a website and app operated by '''Brilliant Worldwide, Inc.''' that provides online courses. Brilliant is a for-profit corporation supported by venture capitalists. Brilliant is most known for its sponsored segments in [[YouTube]] videos, where the service is often promoted by presenters who are renowned for their evidence-based points of view, as well as for scrutinizing and refuting pseudoscience and scams.<!-- The last edit entirely misses the point of the following image. This entire point of adding this image was to provide evidence of the claim that Brilliant has a “content team” instead of actual teachers and professors. The last edit also removes this claim despite the evidence. I'm not able to create a talk page because the captcha doesn't work, which is why I'm writing a comment directly on the page. --> | '''[[wikipedia:Brilliant_(website)|Brilliant]]''' (also known as '''Brilliant.org''') is a website and app operated by '''Brilliant Worldwide, Inc.''' that provides online courses. Brilliant is a for-profit corporation supported by venture capitalists. Brilliant is most known for its sponsored segments in [[YouTube]] videos, where the service is often promoted by presenters who are renowned for their evidence-based points of view, as well as for scrutinizing and refuting pseudoscience and scams.<!-- The last edit entirely misses the point of the following image. This entire point of adding this image was to provide evidence of the claim that Brilliant has a “content team” instead of actual teachers and professors. The last edit also removes this claim despite the evidence. I'm not able to create a talk page because the captcha doesn't work, which is why I'm writing a comment directly on the page. --> | ||