Projects talk:Archive everything: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

Add topic

Revision as of 16:31, 2 March 2026 edit Tempo123 (talk \| contribs) confirmed 354 edits →Redacted evidence is no evidence.: Reply Tag: Reply ← Older edit		Revision as of 21:34, 5 March 2026 edit undo JodyBruchonFan (talk \| contribs) confirmed 183 edits →Redacted evidence is no evidence.: question Tag: Reply Newer edit →
Line 96:		Line 96:

	:The evidence is archived further down that Wiki RFC thread. There are IA and Megalodon archives of the Archive.today page showing "Nora Puchreiner" being altered to show "Jani Patokallio". The original Archive.today snapshot has since been reverted back to the original "Nora Puchreiner", but the Megalodon and IA archives are existing evidence of the snapshot having indeed been altered at a certain point in time. Just a single minor instance, however insignificant, of snapshots being altered completely invalidates the reliability of Archive.today as an archival service. That is all, of course, not mentioning the character of the individual Archive.today admin being petty and malign enough to direct visitors' traffic to unknowingly DDoS someone's personal blog site and levy various additional threats, which in my mind is alone enough of a reason to cease using their service. [[User:Tempo123\|Tempo123]] ([[User talk:Tempo123\|talk]]) 16:31, 2 March 2026 (UTC)		:The evidence is archived further down that Wiki RFC thread. There are IA and Megalodon archives of the Archive.today page showing "Nora Puchreiner" being altered to show "Jani Patokallio". The original Archive.today snapshot has since been reverted back to the original "Nora Puchreiner", but the Megalodon and IA archives are existing evidence of the snapshot having indeed been altered at a certain point in time. Just a single minor instance, however insignificant, of snapshots being altered completely invalidates the reliability of Archive.today as an archival service. That is all, of course, not mentioning the character of the individual Archive.today admin being petty and malign enough to direct visitors' traffic to unknowingly DDoS someone's personal blog site and levy various additional threats, which in my mind is alone enough of a reason to cease using their service. [[User:Tempo123\|Tempo123]] ([[User talk:Tempo123\|talk]]) 16:31, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
			::I agree that falsifying snapshots is a severe breach of trust, but: "The evidence is archived further down that Wiki RFC thread." - If it is the same evidence, what was the point of redacting the original evidence in the first place? [[User:JodyBruchonFan\|JodyBruchonFan]] ([[User talk:JodyBruchonFan\|talk]]) 21:34, 5 March 2026 (UTC)