Jump to content

DMCA Section 1201: Difference between revisions

From Consumer Rights Wiki
Dosjdhdjdjdhdjdjdj (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Visual edit
Dosjdhdjdjdhdjdjdj (talk | contribs)
m Added example
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Visual edit
Line 9: Line 9:


==Examples==
==Examples==
{{Incomplete section}}
===Echelon bike firmware update===
 
''Main article: [[Echelon fitness firmware lockout]]''
 


==See Also==
==See Also==

Revision as of 08:14, 6 March 2026

This article is a stub. You can help by expanding it.

A moderator needs to check the page before this notice can be removed. Visit the noticeboard or the #appeals channel in either Zulip or Discord to request removal.
More info ▼

An article may be flagged as a stub when it is missing major elements needed to make it useful to a reader. You can help by adding missing sections, verifiable sources, relevant company policies and communications, etc. to make the article more complete.

Section 1201 of the DMCA is a section in the DMCA which prevents users from breaking digital locks.[1][2]

Why this is problematic

The law is problematic as it prevents users from being able to break a digital lock, because of this law, manufacturers can remotely modify user’s devices in order to force a subscription or encourage the user to buy a new device.

This law is also why FULU Bounty winners cannot share their solutions legally in the United States.

Examples

Echelon bike firmware update

Main article: Echelon fitness firmware lockout


See Also

References

  1. Copyright.gov (2018). "Section 1201 Exemptions to Prohibition Against Circumvention of Technological Measures Protecting Copyrighted Works". U.S. Copyright Office. Retrieved 5 March 2026.
  2. Law.cornell.edu. "17 U.S. Code § 1201 - Circumvention of copyright protection systems". Cornell Law School. Retrieved 5 March 2026.