DMCA Section 1201

❗Article Status Notice: This Article is a stub

---

This article is underdeveloped, and needs additional work to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues. Learn more ▼

Issues may include:

• This article needs to be expanded to provide meaningful information
• This article requires additional verifiable evidence to demonstrate systemic impact
• More documentation is needed to establish how this reflects broader consumer protection concerns
• The connection between individual incidents and company-wide practices needs to be better established
• The article is simply too short, and lacks sufficient content

How you can help:

• Add documented examples with verifiable sources
• Provide evidence of similar incidents affecting other consumers
• Include relevant company policies or communications that demonstrate systemic practices
• Link to credible reporting that covers these issues
• Flesh out the article with relevant information

This notice will be removed once the article is sufficiently developed. Once you believe the article is ready to have its notice removed, please visit the Moderator's noticeboard, or the Discord (join here) and post to the #appeals channel, or mention its status on the article's talk page.

Section 1201 of the DMCA is a section in the DMCA which prevents users from breaking digital locks.

Why this is problematic

The law is problematic as it prevents users from being able to break a digital lock, because of this law, manufacturers can remotely modify user’s devices in order to force a subscription or encourage the user to buy a new device. Usually the remote modifications of devices are performed over the internet which is why manufacturers require the devices to be connected at all times.

This law is also why FULU Bounty winners cannot share their solutions legally in the United States.

Examples

With the assurance of DMCA Section 1201 preventing owners of devices from breaking digital locks, manufacturers intentionally create digital locks on their products to generate higher profits.

Echelon bike firmware update

Main article: Echelon fitness firmware lockout

Echelon remotely changed the firmware on its bikes in order to gain money from subscriptions. Echelon also removed third-party applications that granted users more features.

Nest Thermostat losing features

Main article: Google Nest thermostat smart features disabled

Futurehome Subscription

Main article: Futurehome Smarthub mandatory subscription fee

Futurehome had forced a subscription upon 30,000 their customers in order to use a product that they had purchased.

John Deere’s Tractors

John Deere’s tractors use digital locks to prevent farmers and independent repair technicians from repairing the equipment. John Deere’s motivation for this practice is to send in their own repair technicians so that they can secure the profit from the repair.

HP printer firmware’s DRM

Main article: HP systemic DRM and firmware lockouts

HP uses DRM to force users to pay for certified HP ink rather than cheaper aftermarket ink, hindering competition.

See Also

• DMCA
• Digital rights management