Talk:Advertising overload: Difference between revisions
→Reminder about the markings: Reply |
→References using dead links, no archive exists: new section |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:Cheers! [[User:Scholar Silas|Scholar Silas]] ([[User talk:Scholar Silas|talk]]) 05:31, 12 March 2026 (UTC) | :Cheers! [[User:Scholar Silas|Scholar Silas]] ([[User talk:Scholar Silas|talk]]) 05:31, 12 March 2026 (UTC) | ||
::I didn't have ai generate those lists for the record, that was a user within the log that was feeling particularly lazy [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 18:51, 13 March 2026 (UTC) | ::I didn't have ai generate those lists for the record, that was a user within the log that was feeling particularly lazy [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 18:51, 13 March 2026 (UTC) | ||
== References using dead links, no archive exists == | |||
References 2. and 4. are dead links (404 error on the sites). I searched IA, Ghostarchive, and Megalodon and there's no archived copies (the snaps show errors). Should these references be removed? They currently use Cite: Web, which (when you Edit references) shows an error because there's no archive link. Should the page's status on [[Projects:Archive everything]] be changed from "Partial" to something else? @[[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|AnotherConsumerRightsPerson]], thoughts? [[User:Marc84|Marc84]] ([[User talk:Marc84|talk]]) 02:26, 10 April 2026 (UTC) | |||