Safe Digital Environments Law

❗This article is a stub. You can help by expanding it.

A moderator needs to check the page before this notice can be removed. Visit the noticeboard or the #appeals channel in either Zulip or Discord to request removal.

More info ▼

An article may be flagged as a stub when it is missing major elements needed to make it useful to a reader. You can help by adding missing sections, verifiable sources, relevant company policies and communications, etc. to make the article more complete.

The Safe Digital Environments Law (in Spanish: Ley de Entornos Digitales Seguros) is a proposed legislation in Chile for banning users under the age of 16 from social media.

Background

With many countries establishing social media bans for minors, such as Malaysia with the Malaysia Online Safety Act 2025 (ONSA), Australia and the European Union proposing to do the same, the Chilean government announced in April 2026 the Safe Digital Environments plan to ban users under 16 from social media.

Proposals

There's no published bill yet, but proposals for the legislations that have been pushed on Brazil, Australia, France, Spain and the European Union. Mentioned proposals from the ministry point to add mandatory age verification to sites that are social media to prevent underage users to access to these sites. The Social Development & Family Minister, María Jesús Wulf, mentioned there are plans of adding age verification systems implementing the national digital ID, ClaveÚnica, in order to access to social media. Proposals also include to add home and school capacitations to teach about the risks of the internet.

Concerns

This legislation project might be incompatible with aspects from the Chilean constitution and the Net Neutrality Law

According to the Chapter III, Article 19, section 12 of the Chilean Politic Constitution of the Republic, that mentions constitutional rights and duties:

12°. The freedom to emit opinion and informing, without previous censorship, in any form and in any media, without the prejudice to respond to crimes and abuse that are commited in the excercise of these liberties in conformity to the law, that must be qualified quorum.

The law cannot in any case to establish a statal monopoly over social communication media.

The potential imposition of ClaveÚnica to the network services as the only method of age verification can be considered as a statal monopoly, and the prohibition of access to minors to access to social media can be considered as a form of censorship because it potentially can block minors or adults that do not want to verify to access to information in social media.

The possibility that a statal system is controlling the internet services to add age verification measurements, erodes consumer rights over a service they're paying for, restricting the control of the user over the service and their freedom to navigate the net.

Consumer response

The legislation project has received mixed responses and generated a broad debate in media, with some users approving it and other rejecting and critizicing its effectiveness. Experts claim the possibility to implement such age verification systems in the country is something difficult, along with the implementation of ClaveÚnica as the method of age verification raises privacy concerns as the statal system is tied with a person's identity. Johannes Kaiser, representative of the National Libertarian Party (PNL) responded claiming the addition of these restrictions are violating the rigths of privacy and freedom and granting the State to surveil Chileans on the net.

Several users in social media, specially on Reddit, in the r/chile subreddit have manifested their concerns with privacy, risks of data breaches, censorship concerns and concerns about the potential expansion of the ban to more sites of the internet, as the project is looking to follow similar international legislations. Some users have also highlighted the incompatibility of the project with the Net Neutrality Law, an established law that prevents telecommunication services to arbitrarily block, interfere or restrict the access to legal content online.

Government response

According to María Jesús Wulf, the bill has "no objective to limit or restrict childrens' own liberties and rights, but protecting them from harassment and harmful influences online". Also she claims the implementations of ClaveÚnica are only "to verify age and not identity".