Jump to content

Medical equipment: Difference between revisions

From Consumer Rights Wiki
HeavenPiercerYama (talk | contribs)
m Added a small description for the page and created a category.
HeavenPiercerYama (talk | contribs)
m expanded page a bit and added citations
Line 25: Line 25:
Ventilators
Ventilators


#https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00445-1/fulltext
#Ventilators were affected by lack of a right to repair, notably during the Covid 19 pandemic<ref>https://www.wyden.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/wyden-markey_auto_privacy_letter_to_ftc.pdf</ref>
#
#


Line 31: Line 31:
Software
Software


https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-law-medicine-and-ethics/article/abs/right-to-repair-softwaredependent-medical-devices/F08B93DD92327BAA34D4D67476A424C9
A study was conducted in Cambridge in relation to software-dependent medical devices and how they would benefit from right to repair<ref>https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2023.28</ref>


[[Category:Echographs]]
[[Category:Echographs]]
== References ==
<references />
<references />

Revision as of 14:09, 30 January 2025

This article is a stub. You can help by expanding it.

A moderator needs to check the page before this notice can be removed. Visit the noticeboard or the #appeals channel in either Zulip or Discord to request removal.
More info ▼

An article may be flagged as a stub when it is missing major elements needed to make it useful to a reader. You can help by adding missing sections, verifiable sources, relevant company policies and communications, etc. to make the article more complete.


Various medical equipment and the companies that produce them have come into scrutiny due to anti-consumer practices.

Examples

Echographs


MRI


CT-Scanners


Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

  1. Terumo Cardiovascular blocks 3rd party repair of the Advanced Perfusion System 1 Heart Lung Machine[1]


Ventilators

  1. Ventilators were affected by lack of a right to repair, notably during the Covid 19 pandemic[2]


Software

A study was conducted in Cambridge in relation to software-dependent medical devices and how they would benefit from right to repair[3]

References