Jump to content

Medical equipment: Difference between revisions

From Consumer Rights Wiki
HeavenPiercerYama (talk | contribs)
m Added a small description for the page and created a category.
HeavenPiercerYama (talk | contribs)
m expanded page a bit and added citations
Line 25: Line 25:
Ventilators
Ventilators


#https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00445-1/fulltext
#Ventilators were affected by lack of a right to repair, notably during the Covid 19 pandemic<ref>https://www.wyden.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/wyden-markey_auto_privacy_letter_to_ftc.pdf</ref>
#
#


Line 31: Line 31:
Software
Software


https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-law-medicine-and-ethics/article/abs/right-to-repair-softwaredependent-medical-devices/F08B93DD92327BAA34D4D67476A424C9
A study was conducted in Cambridge in relation to software-dependent medical devices and how they would benefit from right to repair<ref>https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2023.28</ref>


[[Category:Echographs]]
[[Category:Echographs]]
== References ==
<references />
<references />

Revision as of 14:09, 30 January 2025

Article Status Notice: This Article is a stub


This article is underdeveloped, and needs additional work to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues. Learn more ▼


Various medical equipment and the companies that produce them have come into scrutiny due to anti-consumer practices.

Examples

Echographs


MRI


CT-Scanners


Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

  1. Terumo Cardiovascular blocks 3rd party repair of the Advanced Perfusion System 1 Heart Lung Machine[1]


Ventilators

  1. Ventilators were affected by lack of a right to repair, notably during the Covid 19 pandemic[2]


Software

A study was conducted in Cambridge in relation to software-dependent medical devices and how they would benefit from right to repair[3]

References