Talk:Mission statement: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:09, 15 January 2025

Concern about mission statement

Latest comment: 14 January1 comment1 person in discussion

The mission statement itself is a bit scaring. It's the first page to see and could turn away people that try to look up something in the future. This article has to move at some point to a more inviting page, maybe not in the next time tho. Tpat90 (talk) 22:06, 14 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

     Agree, but until we are aiming to attract readers rather than contributors, I'm happy for us to keep it as is. It'll likely be a while before the wiki is useful to a casual reader  Keith

Revision as of 15:56, 15 January 2025 edit EchoKnight (talk \| contribs) 1 edit m adjusted layout and formatting to better fit a proper MediaWiki talk page, including adding user's signature and creating a heading with a suitable title ← Older edit		Revision as of 16:09, 15 January 2025 edit undo Keith (talk \| contribs) Autoconfirmed users, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Push subscription managers, superadmin, Suppressors, Administrators 431 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 2:		Line 2:

	The mission statement itself is a bit scaring. It's the first page to see and could turn away people that try to look up something in the future. This article has to move at some point to a more inviting page, maybe not in the next time tho. [[User:Tpat90\|Tpat90]] ([[User talk:Tpat90\|talk]]) 22:06, 14 January 2025 (UTC)		The mission statement itself is a bit scaring. It's the first page to see and could turn away people that try to look up something in the future. This article has to move at some point to a more inviting page, maybe not in the next time tho. [[User:Tpat90\|Tpat90]] ([[User talk:Tpat90\|talk]]) 22:06, 14 January 2025 (UTC)


			Agree, but until we are aiming to attract readers rather than contributors, I'm happy for us to keep it as is. It'll likely be a while before the wiki is useful to a casual reader [[User:Keith\|Keith]]