Jump to content

Game-of-telephone privacy policy

From Consumer Rights Wiki
Revision as of 05:13, 27 January 2025 by CATalyst (talk | contribs)

This article is a stub. You can help by expanding it.

A moderator needs to check the page before this notice can be removed. Visit the noticeboard or the #appeals channel in either Zulip or Discord to request removal.
More info ▼

An article may be flagged as a stub when it is missing major elements needed to make it useful to a reader. You can help by adding missing sections, verifiable sources, relevant company policies and communications, etc. to make the article more complete.

⚠️This article has been marked as incomplete. Sourcing or verifiability needs additional work.

A moderator needs to check the page before this notice can be removed. Visit the noticeboard or the #appeals channel in either Zulip or Discord to request removal.
More info ▼

Articles must provide verifiable, credible evidence for their claims and avoid relying on forum posts, personal blogs, or other unverifiable sources. You can help by replacing weak citations with reputable reporting, corporate communications, receipts, repair logs, or independent investigative coverage that demonstrates the systemic relevance required by the Mission statement and Moderator Guidelines.

When a consumer reviews a privacy policy, this privacy policy is supposed to inform the consumer what data will be collected, and how the data will be used. A game-of-telephone privacy policy constitutes a situation whereby a consumer's agreement with an app developer may be different between the app developer's agreement with a third party. For instance:

  1. Third party says that data collected using their SDK can be used to determine insurance rates by insurance providers.
  2. Third party licenses SDK to app developer who agrees to these terms.
  3. App developer says to app user that application collects location data just to provide me in-app services & that it may be shared with third parties.
  4. App developer never discloses to app user that collected data will be used to determine app user's insurance rates.
  5. App developer does not meaningfully disclose relationship with third party in their terms of service.

This is akin to me agreeing with my friend James that we may engage in violent behavior. You become friends with my friend James. Therefore, as a result of your friendship with James, it becomes implied that you have agreed to violent behavior.

An excellent example of this would be the relationship between Arity (a business that sells data-collection SDKs), the mobile apps that use Arity SDKs, and the user of those mobile apps, mentioned in the Allstate Arity driver data theft case.