Talk:Google Gemini

Revision as of 01:01, 12 October 2025 by Drakeula (talk | contribs) (Relevancy discussion: another gemini ref)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Latest comment: 12 October by Drakeula in topic Relevancy discussion

Relevancy discussion

I'm not seeing any listed incidents on the wiki here for Google Gemini. 📎 JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 01:31, 28 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

@JackFromWisconsin I don’t see any incidents related to consumer rights after doing a search either. AnotherConsumerRightsPerson (talk) 06:15, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Gemini is subject to many of the same anti-consumer problems as most LLM/chatbots. (Misleading/false advertising. Consumer manipulation. etc.)
Here are a couple of examples. These happen to be about privacy, security and autonomy, but there is lots more out there.
Hack a smart home with a calendar invite! And Google Gemini[1]
Prompt-inject an AI chatbot with … an image![2]
Drakeula (talk) 21:57, 4 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Google says they will not be fixing One of the attack types (ASCII injection) mentioned in article above about prompt injection. (One that is actually fixable.) Google won’t fix ‘ASCII smuggling’ hack in Gemini AI [[3]]
Gemini is pretty much anywhere you find Google apps, so the targets are plentiful, and Google is going to keep 'em nice and vulnerable. Not good for consumers. Drakeula (talk) 01:01, 12 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Return to "Google Gemini" page.