Fake lifetime license

Revision as of 05:50, 1 July 2026 by ClippyWantsToHelp (talk | contribs) (Examples)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This article is a stub. You can help by expanding it.

A moderator needs to check the page before this notice can be removed. Visit the noticeboard or the #appeals channel in either Zulip or Discord to request removal.
More info ▼

An article may be flagged as a stub when it is missing major elements needed to make it useful to a reader. You can help by adding missing sections, verifiable sources, relevant company policies and communications, etc. to make the article more complete.

A Fake lifetime license is a type of license that misleadingly claims it is permanent, doesn't have any expiration date and couldn't be revoked.

This is distinct from post-purchase EULA modification, as the license was never changed, it was always fake.

How it works

Fake lifetime licences are advertised as perpetual licenses that cannot be revoked or modified. Companies may deceptively use this practice on a product or service as having a "lifetime" or "forever" license, but when a customer legally gets a license (typically by paying money), the customer is only allowed to use the product/service for a limited period of time.

Sometimes, the "lifetime" refers to the warranty of the product, not the lifetime of the customer.

Companies do this to artificially increase profits, such as making their licensed copies unusable or making them very limited to encourage users to purchase another license for the same product or a more recent version of it, or by switching to a subscription model for recurring revenue.[1]

Why it is a problem

Most, if not all, customers expect the license to last for as long as humanly possible. When the expectation breaks, they need to change their plans

Misleading advertising

Fake lifetime licenses hide the aspect that these licenses have already an established or undefined expiration date that might make the product only accessible via subscription payment or making it partially or completely inaccessible.

Erosion of consumer rights

The removal of a fake lifetime license erodes the rights of a consumer who purchased these licenses expecting to do a one-time purchase and keep their license forever, making them unable to use all product's features or access it again only if they pay a recurring fee or a new, taking away their right of ownership.

Discrimination

Users who paid for a fake perpetual license might not be able to afford purchasing a new one or paying a subscription, specially if the company increases the prices of the new licenses or subscription fees.

Examples

References

  1. Grigonis, Hillary (2022-05-15). "After a record-breaking year, Adobe officially axes the old Creative Suite". Digital Trends. Archived from the original on 2022-08-09.