Magnuson–Moss Warranty Act

⚠️This article has been marked as incomplete. Sourcing or verifiability needs additional work.

A moderator needs to check the page before this notice can be removed. Visit the noticeboard or the #appeals channel in either Zulip or Discord to request removal.

More info ▼

Articles must provide verifiable, credible evidence for their claims and avoid relying on forum posts, personal blogs, or other unverifiable sources. You can help by replacing weak citations with reputable reporting, corporate communications, receipts, repair logs, or independent investigative coverage that demonstrates the systemic relevance required by the Mission statement and Moderator Guidelines.

TODO: Would like someone to look over the law's textand give a more robust summary; until then the summary is from Wikipedia.

Summary

The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act of 1975 is a landmark U.S. federal law (15 U.S.C. § 2301 et seq.) enacted on January 4, 1975, to govern consumer product warranties. Sponsored by Senator Warren G. Magnuson and representative John E. Moss, the Act was designed to address widespread misuse of warranties by manufactures through unfair disclaimers and misleading practices.

Primary objectives:

• Make warranties more transparent and enforceable for consumers.
• Establish federal standards for warranty content and disclosure.
• Enhance the Federal Trade Commission's consumer protection capabilities.

Warranty requirements:

• Disclosure standards
  • Must disclose terms conspicuously in clear simple language and specify:
    • Coverage details and duration
    • Remedies available
    • Exclusions and limitations
    • Procedures for obtaining service

• Full and limited warranties:
  • Full warranty: Must meet federal minimum standards including free repair/replacement, no time limits on implied warranties, and option for refund/replacement after reasonable repair attempts
  • Limited warranty: Must be conspicuously designated 'limited' if federal minimum standards are not meet.
  • Implied Warranties: The Act preserves state-law implied warranties and prohibits their disclaimer when a written warranty is provided

In cases of violation, consumers are encouraged to negotiate with warrantors under arbitration. Additionally, the federal government and consumers are able to file civil suits in the courts.

History of Enforcement

The act is an important piece of legislation, but its enforcement is a mixed bag. Although it is enforced, often the fines are little to nothing, which encourages manufacturers to disregard it. This effectively prevents the act from properly keeping vendors accountable.

Toyota held labile for all damages in used car's in-warranty repair case - June 16, 1992.

"Due to the purchase of the subject vehicle in used `as is' condition, the Defendant (Toyota) dealer assumed and bore no responsibility for subsequent repair of the vehicle or its road worthiness. " the plaintiff (vehicle owner) was found to be correct and the defendant (toyota) was found liable for damages plaintiff (vehicle owner) suffered as a result of that violation