Jump to content

Lockdown Browser

From Consumer Rights Wiki
Revision as of 01:24, 18 June 2026 by IRC-user-12 (talk | contribs) (Marked the article as incomplete)
Lockdown Browser
Basic Information
Release Year 2016
Product Type Software, Web browser
In Production No
Official Website https://web.respondus.com/he/lockdownbrowser/

⚠️This article has been marked as incomplete. Sourcing or verifiability needs additional work.

A moderator needs to check the page before this notice can be removed. Visit the noticeboard or the #appeals channel in either Zulip or Discord to request removal.
More info ▼

Articles must provide verifiable, credible evidence for their claims and avoid relying on forum posts, personal blogs, or other unverifiable sources. You can help by replacing weak citations with reputable reporting, corporate communications, receipts, repair logs, or independent investigative coverage that demonstrates the systemic relevance required by the Mission statement and Moderator Guidelines.

Lockdown Browser, or LockDown Browser, is a custom web browser that locks down a student's computer during an exam, it often is integrated with learning management systems, such as Canvas, Schoology, etc.[1] The first documented version released in 2016[2], and it grew in relevance during and after the Covid-19 Lock-downs[3].

Lockdown Browser integrates with Respondus Monitor. The former is mainly responsible for preventing students to access their computer during exams, and the latter is mainly responsible for monitoring the students during examinations. The restriction of access include disabling of browser toolbar, windows feature (such as print screen, accessing computer's tool bar), the ability to exit the application, the ability to power off the computer, keyboard functions, and more.[1]

Impact-Summary

Overview of concerns that arise from the conduct towards users of the product (if applicable):

  • User freedom
  • User privacy
  • Business model
  • Market control

Add your text below this box. Once this section is complete, delete this box by clicking on it and pressing backspace.


Student Privacy

According the Respondus's Privacy Policy[4], LockDown Browser access many private information depending on institutional policies, such as using facial recognition, "internet and network activity information," screen captures, and etc. Researchers had softwares like Lockdown Browser to be "invasive monitoring tools" and surveyed privacy concerns amongst students[5]. Further, in Ogletree v. Cleveland State University[6], the U.S. District Court concluded the following:

Based on consideration of these factors, individually and collectively, the Court concludes that Mr. Ogletree’s privacy interest in his home outweighs Cleveland State’s interests in scanning his room. Accordingly, the Court determines that Cleveland State’s practice of conducting room scans is unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment.

In response to the ruling, Respondus official statement[7] updated its own privacy policy and terms of use, such as the following:

Respondus has taken several steps to help universities strengthen their online testing policies. First, it has added the following paragraph to the boilerplate text that universities often use for their portion of the Student Terms of Use for Respondus Monitor.

If your institution or instructor permits you to use Respondus Monitor at a non-university location, you agree to select a location that meets any and all university guidelines. If the location you choose is a home or personal environment, you agree to allow your activity and surrounding workspace to be recorded by video and audio and then analyzed by the Respondus Monitor system.

Similar text has been added to the Terms of Use section that is between Respondus and the student:

If you are using Respondus Monitor at your home or in a personal area, you agree to allow your activity and surrounding workspace area to be recorded by video and audio and then to be analyzed by the Respondus Monitor system.

Incidents

Add one-paragraph summaries of incidents below in sub-sections, which link to each incident's main article while linking to the main article and including a short summary. It is acceptable to create an incident summary before the main page for an incident has been created. To link to the page use the "Hatnote" or "Main" templates.

If the company has numerous incidents then format them in a table (see Amazon for an example).


Add your text below this box. Once this section is complete, delete this box by clicking on it and pressing backspace.


This is a list of all consumer-protection incidents related to this product. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the Lockdown Browser category.

Example incident one (date)

Main article: link to the main CR Wiki article

Short summary of the incident (could be the same as the summary preceding the article).

Example incident two (date)

...


See also

Link to relevant theme articles or companies with similar incidents.


Add your text below this box. Once this section is complete, delete this box by clicking on it and pressing backspace.



References

  1. 1.0 1.1 "LockDown Browser Resources". Respondus.com. 2026-06-17. Archived from the original on 2024-10-02. Retrieved 2026-06-17.
  2. "LockDown Browser Version History". Respondus.com. 2020-11-29. Archived from the original on 2020-11-29. Retrieved 2026-06-17.
  3. "Google Trend - Searches on LockDown Browser".{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  4. "Privacy Center". Respondus.com. 2025-09-12. Archived from the original on 2026-05-30. Retrieved 2026-06-17.
  5. Balash, D. G., Kim, D., Shaibekova, D., Fainchtein, R. A., Sherr, M., & Aviv, A. J. (2021, June 10). Examining the Examiners: Students’ Privacy and Security Perceptions of Online Proctoring Services. ArXiv.org. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.05917
  6. [web.respondus.com/wp- content/uploads/2023/02/Doc-50-Amended-Opinion-and-Order-Ogletree.pdf. "Ogletree v. Cleaveland State University"]. {{cite web}}: |archive-url= requires |archive-date= (help); Check |url= value (help)
  7. "Our Take on the Ogletree Ruling". 2023-02-14. Archived from the original on 2025-08-11. Retrieved 2026-06-17.