Jump to content

Nintendo's May 2025 Policy Updates

From Consumer_Action_Taskforce
Revision as of 09:38, 14 May 2025 by JamesTDG (talk | contribs) (Replacement article made and prepped!)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Article Status Notice: This Article is a stub

Notice: This Article Requires Additional Expansion

This article is underdeveloped, and needs additional work to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues. Issues may include:

  • This article needs to be expanded to provide meaningful information
  • This article requires additional verifiable evidence to demonstrate systemic impact
  • More documentation is needed to establish how this reflects broader consumer protection concerns
  • The connection between individual incidents and company-wide practices needs to be better established
  • The article is simply too short, and lacks sufficient content

How You Can Help:

  • Add documented examples with verifiable sources
  • Provide evidence of similar incidents affecting other consumers
  • Include relevant company policies or communications that demonstrate systemic practices
  • Link to credible reporting that covers these issues
  • Flesh out the article with relevant information

This notice will be removed once the article is sufficiently developed. Once you believe the article is ready to have its notice removed, visit the Discord (join here) and post to the #appeals channel, or mention its status on the article's talk page.

On May 8th, 2025, Nintendo released changes to the Nintendo Account User Agreement[1] and Privacy Policy[2][3] which has the potential to severely impact consumers. Highlights include restrictions on what content consumers can broadcast or post with Nintendo-published games under section 6, the reservation to "render the Nintendo Account Services and/or the applicable Nintendo device permanently unusable in whole or in part" under section 13,[4] and forced arbitration under Section 16.

Background[edit | edit source]

Nintendo has historically been known to be restrictive with how the company has enforced its policies; during the time the company has supported the Wii U, users attempting to share footage of their games were at risk of having said content taken down,[5][6] later requiring consumers to join an affiliate program[7] that claimed 30-40% of the video's revenue,[8] and restricting content being made that would be critical of Nintendo or its IP.[8]

The enforcement of these policies has also seen the closure of Tournaments,[9] lawsuits against competing studios,the persistent war on emulation,and more. Due to how far Nintendo has historically aimed to enforce every extent of their policies, it is reasonable to expect these policy updates to be similarly enforced.

The updates[edit | edit source]

In early May, Nintendo published updates to the Nintendo Account User Agreement[1] and Privacy Policy[10], these updates included significant changes over the rights consumers have both over the products they own, and their legal rights when attempting to sue the company.

Due to an error in the email systems of Nintendo, many consumers were informed several days after the terms were applicable, thus giving them no reasonable time to 'opt-out' of the changes via the only means of deleting their account, as was affirmed by the email.[citation needed]

A transcript of the email:

We're writing to let you know that we've updated the Nintendo Account User Agreement and Nintendo Privacy Policy, If you or any users under your Nintendo Account continue to use any Nintendo Account Services, including by keeping your or their Nintendo Account open, then you affirm you agree to the updated Nintendo Account User Agreement and acknowledge you have read the updated Nintendo Privacy Policy on your and their behalf. If You do not agree to the changes, you must cancel your Nintendo Account immediately.

Nintendo Account User Agreement. The updates include important updates to how you and Nintendo will arbitrate disputes. See our What's changed? page for a summary of changes, but you should also review the full updated Nintendo Account User Agreement to ensure you understand your rights and obligations.

Nintendo Privacy Policy. The updates include important updates regarding the categories of information we may collect and how we might use your information. See our What's changed? page for a summary of changes, but you should also review the full updated Nintendo Privacy Policy to ensure you understand the policy.

Feel free to contact us with any questions.

Details of the updated terms[edit | edit source]

This section will be added, and will cover sections 6, 13, 16, and potentially the privacy policy update surrounding recording video and audio interactions

Placeholder ref[11]

Nintendo's response[edit | edit source]

Editor's notice: A wiki member has contacted Nintendo and is currently awaiting a response, the email will be provided below in plaintext and in a screenshot so that users can accessibly read this email.

If applicable, add the proposed solution to the issues by the company.


Add your text below this box. Once this section is complete, delete this box by clicking on it and pressing backspace.


Consumer response[edit | edit source]

There has been significant consumer backlash over the changes of these terms, often leaving many to expect that Nintendo is attempting to reserve their right to 'brick' consoles owned by consumers as a measure of policy enforcement.[12][13][14][15] It is additionally seen through major publications such as Eurogamer[16] and Game File[17] who've also been reporting the same details.

References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 "Nintendo Account User Agreement EULA".
  2. Nintendo. "Nintendo Privacy Policy". Nintendo Accounts. Retrieved May 9, 2025.
  3. "Nintendo Privacy Policy Summary Changes".
  4. "Nintendo EULA Summary".
  5. Macdonald, Keza (May 16, 2013). "Nintendo Enforces Copyright on Youtube Let's Plays". IGN. Retrieved May 14, 2025.
  6. Orland, Kyle (Oct 2, 2017). "Nintendo no longer welcoming YouTube livestreams of its games". Ars Technica. Retrieved May 14, 2025.
  7. Pitcher, Jenna (Aug 16, 2021). "Nintendo Rolls Out Beta Affiliate Program for YouTube Creators". IGN. Retrieved May 14, 2025.
  8. 8.0 8.1 Orland, Kyle (Jan 29, 2015). "Nintendo to share up to 70 percent of ad revenue with game YouTubers". Ars Technica. Retrieved May 14, 2025.
  9. Orland, Kyle (Jul 11, 2013). "Why Nintendo can legally shut down any Smash Bros. tournament it wants". Ars Technica.
  10. "Nintendo Privacy Policy".
  11. McNeal, Ryan (May 9, 2025). "Nintendo warns it may brick your Switch if you engage in unauthorized use". Android Authority. Retrieved May 14, 2025.
  12. Run N Game Entertainment (May 13, 2025). "Is Nintendo breaking the law?". YouTube. Retrieved May 14, 2025.
  13. Fasho, Kang (May 11, 2025). "The Switch 2 will RUIN Gaming [Full Controversy Explained] (Angry Rant)". Retrieved May 14, 2025.
  14. NintenDeen (May 9, 2025). "Console Bans". YouTube. Retrieved May 14, 2025.
  15. Psybeam (May 9, 2025). "Nintendo Can Now Permanently Disable Your Switch If You're Found Modding". YouTube. Retrieved May 14, 2025.
  16. Nightingale, Ed (May 9, 2025). "Nintendo reserves the right to brick your console following "unauthorised use", in bid to prevent piracy". Eurogamer. Retrieved May 9, 2025.
  17. Totilo, Stephen (May 8, 2025). "Nintendo warns it may brick Switch systems whose users "bypass, modify, decrypt, defeat, tamper with" their games and services". Game File. Retrieved May 14, 2025.


Add a category with the same name as the product, service, website, software, product line or company that this article is about.

The "Incidents" category is not needed.


Add your text below this box. Once this section is complete, delete this box by clicking on it and pressing backspace.