User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson/Quiz

This is a quiz on what is in or out of scope for the Wiki. These examples are purely fictional. The articles will be shorter than they should be; this is purely to make it easier to read. Please do not judge them as not allowed because of that. Additionally, citations will not have links since they are examples.

Samsung TV suddenly breaks and customer support doesn't help

Background

Samsung sells TVs that many claim to be good.

[Incident]

My TV suddenly broke and I emailed customer support. However, customer support just directed me to buy a new TV.

For the answer, click ‘Expand’ on the right.

Not allowed There are no sources to show this is an example of large-scale customer abuse and to show it isn't just lies. It is also out of scope for the wiki and reads like a Yelp review.

---

Logitech Mouse automatically bricks after 1.5 years

Background

The Logitech G583 Gaming Mouse has received great reviews from critics.

[Incident]

The Logitech G583 Gaming Mouse has an issue where after one and a half years of use, it automatically bricks and stops working.

For the answer, click ‘Expand’ on the right.

Allowed This is clearly showing that this is systemic and an actual issue. The only slight issue is it should have a few more references, or it will likely be tagged as incomplete.

---

Internet

The Internet is a network of computers.

Why it is a problem

The Internet can be used by products to brick devices.

For the answer, click ‘Expand’ on the right.

Not allowed This may talk about something that can be used against consumers, like DRM where products have to connect to the internet to be used, but in this case, it is out of scope for the wiki, as not much more can be achieved compared to linking the Wikipedia page for it (assuming you need to link it somewhere at all).

---

Randle

Randle is a car making company.

Incidents

ToS includes forced arbitration

The ToS includes forced arbitration.

For the answer, click ‘Expand’ on the right.

Allowed Forced arbitration is definitely in scope, and although there is only two references, it is clearly systemic.

References

These are all the references for every example article.