Interchangeable parts

❗Article Status Notice: This Article is a stub

---

This article is underdeveloped, and needs additional work to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues. Learn more ▼

Issues may include:

• This article needs to be expanded to provide meaningful information
• This article requires additional verifiable evidence to demonstrate systemic impact
• More documentation is needed to establish how this reflects broader consumer protection concerns
• The connection between individual incidents and company-wide practices needs to be better established
• The article is simply too short, and lacks sufficient content

How you can help:

• Add documented examples with verifiable sources
• Provide evidence of similar incidents affecting other consumers
• Include relevant company policies or communications that demonstrate systemic practices
• Link to credible reporting that covers these issues
• Flesh out the article with relevant information

This notice will be removed once the article is sufficiently developed. Once you believe the article is ready to have its notice removed, please visit the Moderator's noticeboard, or the Discord (join here) and post to the #appeals channel, or mention its status on the article's talk page.

Interchangeable parts are components designed for wider compatibility beyond the original product. Components ranging from philip screws in a laptop to hubcaps for the wheels of a car engage with the principle of interchangeability, allowing individuals to repair or replace parts as needed. Most notably, this principle removes dependence on the original manufacturer of the product, and it is a necessary attribute of right to repair.

Examples

• Replacement ink/toner cartridges for printers and copiers.
• Automotive headlights used to be circular and fairly standardized.

Some examples of Interchangeable parts include:

*
*
*

---

Add your text below this box. Once this section is complete, delete this box by clicking on it and pressing backspace.

Why it matters

Interchangeability was initially devised as a way to reduce cost, simplify the assembly of goods for accessibility and repair, reduce inventory, and scaling. More manufacturers actively reject interchangeable parts as time goes on. Proprietary parts or supplies may mean more profit for the manufacturer if they can charge more for their special part, or keep a customer locked in to their products. Today, as right-to-repair has developed into a reactionary principle for what should be a given, interchangeability becomes a part of the conversation.

For example:

• Apple is known for using unique screws in their digital devices where the screws can neither be replaced, nor can a technician use a common screwdriver to repair the devices. This forces consumers to seek Apple verified technicians, which often means paying a premium or upgrading their device altogether.
• Many printer companies, including Epson, Canon, and Brother, are physically able to accept ink cartridges outside of the original printer manufacturer. However, printer firmware often rejects third-party cartridges or has compatibility error despite cartridge fit.