Jump to content

License euthanasia

From Consumer Rights Wiki
Revision as of 08:40, 11 October 2025 by Drakeula (talk | contribs) (Suggest merge into Retroactively amended purchase)

This article is a stub. You can help by expanding it.

A moderator needs to check the page before this notice can be removed. Visit the noticeboard or the #appeals channel in either Zulip or Discord to request removal.
More info ▼

An article may be flagged as a stub when it is missing major elements needed to make it useful to a reader. You can help by adding missing sections, verifiable sources, relevant company policies and communications, etc. to make the article more complete.

⚠️This article has been marked as incomplete. Sourcing or verifiability needs additional work.

A moderator needs to check the page before this notice can be removed. Visit the noticeboard or the #appeals channel in either Zulip or Discord to request removal.
More info ▼

Articles must provide verifiable, credible evidence for their claims and avoid relying on forum posts, personal blogs, or other unverifiable sources. You can help by replacing weak citations with reputable reporting, corporate communications, receipts, repair logs, or independent investigative coverage that demonstrates the systemic relevance required by the Mission statement and Moderator Guidelines.

🔄 A merge request has been made for this article

There has been a merge request for this page for the following reason:

Seems to be a special case of modifying license terms after purchase. Could be covered as a subsection of more general article.

Merge with: Retroactively amended purchase


Once the merge has been completed, please contact a mod, who can delete the extra pages. Alternatively, edit the unneeded pages such that they contain only a redirect to the merged page.

If you believe the merge has been completed but the page is still not deleted please contact a moderator either on discord or via their talk pages.


“License euthanasia” is the practice of revoking perpetual licenses under the pretext that the company is looking out for the user’s best interest by forcing them to update to a later version. This term was coined by consumer-rights advocate Louis Rossmann, who observed that Final Draft’s description of an older version of its software as being “of advanced age” “made it sound like they’re doing the kind thing” by putting old software out of its misery.[1]