Jump to content

AMD

From Consumer Rights Wiki
Revision as of 13:18, 24 January 2026 by SinexTitan (talk | contribs) (link modernisation)

This article is a stub. You can help by expanding it.

A moderator needs to check the page before this notice can be removed. Visit the noticeboard or the #appeals channel in either Zulip or Discord to request removal.
More info ▼

An article may be flagged as a stub when it is missing major elements needed to make it useful to a reader. You can help by adding missing sections, verifiable sources, relevant company policies and communications, etc. to make the article more complete.

AMD
Basic information
Founded 1969-05-01
Legal Structure Public
Industry Semiconductors, Computer hardware
Also known as
Official website https://www.amd.com/

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. or AMD is an American technology company that designs and sells computer components such as central processing unit (CPUs), graphics_processing_unit (GPUs) and related products for both commercial and enterprise use. It was founded on May 01, 1969, by Jerry Sanders and a group of his colleagues from Fairchild Semiconductor.[citation needed (2 Dec 2025)]

Consumer-impact summary

Overview of concerns that arise from the conduct towards users of the product (if applicable):

  • User freedom
  • User privacy
  • Business model
  • Market control

Add your text below this box. Once this section is complete, delete this box by clicking on it and pressing backspace.


Incidents

This is a list of all consumer-protection incidents this company is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the AMD category.

Abandonment of the sTRX4 platform (2019)

Main article: link to the main article

On November 25, 2019, AMD released socket sTRX4 alongside their Threadripper 3000 series of HEDT (high-end desktop) processors with the promise of long term support for the platform.[1][2] This along with the strong reputation of socket AM4 led many people to invest into the platform. Despite the promises made, AMD ultimately fell flat and only supported a total of one generation of CPUs before freezing the regular Ryzen Threadripper lineup till the release of Threadripper 7000 on socket sTR5.

"Bulldozer" CPU false advertisement lawsuit (2015-2019)

AMD settled the lawsuit with a $12.1 million payout, which is estimated to have compensated up to $35 per applicant that could give a proof of purchase. The complaint was about the Bulldozer processors being marketed as the "first native 8-core desktop processor," while this was allegedly false advertising. The CPU has 4 modules with each 2 sub-processors that shared resources instead of 8 independent cores that could perform separately and simultaneously.[3][4] And it was demonstrated that the alleged customer damages caused by the allegedly misleading claims can be measured on a class-wide basis.[5]

Products

CPUs:

GPUs:

See also

References

  1. AMDOfficial. "Performance Preview: 3rd Gen AMD Ryzen Threadripper Processors for Creators". Reddit. Archived from the original on 2025-08-02. Retrieved 2025-08-02.
  2. Jeffrey, Cal (2019-11-12). "AMD commits to 'long-term' support for sTRX4 CPU socket used with third-gen Threadripper". TechSpot. Archived from the original on 2025-08-02. Retrieved 2025-08-02.
  3. Martin, Dylan (27 Aug 2019). "AMD Reaches $12.1M Settlement In Bulldozer False Advertising Suit". CRN. Archived from the original on 10 Aug 2024. Retrieved 2 Dec 2025.
  4. Hachman, Mark (28 Aug 2019). "AMD settles Bulldozer class-action suit that could pay out up to $35 per chip". PCWorld. Archived from the original on 3 Oct 2024. Retrieved 2 Dec 2025.
  5. "Dickey v. Advanced Micro Devices" (PDF). The Register. 22 Jan 2019. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 Feb 2024. Retrieved 2 Dec 2025.