This article is underdeveloped, and needs additional work to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues.
Learn more ▼
Issues may include:
This article needs to be expanded to provide meaningful information
This article requires additional verifiable evidence to demonstrate systemic impact
More documentation is needed to establish how this reflects broader consumer protection concerns
The connection between individual incidents and company-wide practices needs to be better established
The article is simply too short, and lacks sufficient content
How you can help:
Add documented examples with verifiable sources
Provide evidence of similar incidents affecting other consumers
Include relevant company policies or communications that demonstrate systemic practices
Link to credible reporting that covers these issues
Flesh out the article with relevant information
This notice will be removed once the article is sufficiently developed. Once you believe the article is ready to have its notice removed, please visit the Moderator's noticeboard, or the Discord (join here) and post to the #appeals channel, or mention its status on the article's talk page.
🧽🫧Article Status Notice: This Article needs to be cleaned up
This article contains sources and content, but is lacking proper format and needs more development to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and provide a high quality and consistent experience for readers.
Learn more ▼
Issues may include:
The article is not following the correct outline for its subject (i.e. incident, company, product)
This article contains references that do not utilize the <ref></ref> tags or Cite web template.
The article has "WIP" mentioned next to content
A quote longer than two sentences does not use the Quote template.
How you can help:
Copy and paste the layout from the aforementioned preload templates (depending on the article's topic)
Take URLs, convert them for the Cite web template, and insert them into the correct sentence where the source can verify a claim.
Remove personal notes left by editors either with <!-- [text here] --> in source editor or when the article is close to being fully cleaned up.
Flesh out the article with relevant information
This notice will be removed once the article is sufficiently developed. Once you believe the article is ready to have its notice removed, please visit the Moderator's noticeboard, or the Discord (join here) and post to the #appeals channel, or mention its status on the article's talk page.
AirPods are wireless earbuds designed by Apple. They first debuted on September 07, 2016 alongside the iPhone 7 and were released on December 13, 2016.[1][2]
Consumer impact summary
AirPods are designed in a way that makes them unrepairable, leading to customers having to buy a new pair after a few years of use. Apple can replace them but will not repair them or help you do it yourself. According to an expert from iFixit:[3]
If you want to take this apart, non-destructively, to replace the batteries, as far as I know, that's impossible.
The rechargeable batteries in AirPods can experience fast-tracked degradation after a certain number of battery cycles[3] with two-year-old sets lasting for less than half of the advertised five hours.[4][5]
Up until September 22, 2023, Apple used their proprietary Lightning connector on the AirPods' charging case.[6]
Apple has a program to service batteries and purchase replacement individual AirPods and charging cases. The replacement of one or both AirPods or the charging case has a lower price with AppleCare+ than without. Apple offers battery servicing for free with AppleCare+ and for a fee without.[5]
User Freedom
The features that AirPods are marketed with restrict interoperability because they are only available within the Apple ecosystem. When used with non-Apple products the functionality is on par with a basic wireless headphone.[7] However there have been projects attempting to regain marketed features of AirPods with non-Apple products, such as LibrePods.[8][9]
Incidents
The following is a list of major incidents involving the Apple AirPods line of headphones.
Moisture buildup inside user PatrikGustafsson's AirPods Max after exercising on an indoor bike.
Many Apple AirPods Max owners have reported moisture issues with the headphones. More specifically, after around 30 or more minutes of use, users have reported a visible buildup of moisture near the speakers of the ear-cups.[10] Depending on the severity of the moisture buildup present, the headphones could fail between five days of use in the more extreme cases, to around three months of use.[11]
Additional conditions contributing to this issue include exercise or climate/humidity levels present when wearing the headphones.
Apple has historically treated the AirPods Max condensation issues as "Liquid Damage", voiding warranties and likely prompting a $300 to $500 replacement.[11]
The AirPods Max moisture issue has been reported thousands of times to Apple and it is very likely that Apple is aware of the issue. Apple has not provided an official statement, warranty exemption, or additional replacement discount for this product.
Overall, this issue demonstrates a general lack of quality control, customer engagement, and transparency.
A security vulnerability was discovered by Jonas Dreßler, this vulnerability would allow an attacker within the bluetooth range of any AirPods device to potentially spoof the source device address, redirecting it to another device controlled by the attacker and gaining control of the AirPods.[12][13]
↑"CVE-2024-27867 Detail". National Institute of Standards and Technology | NIST. 2024-06-24. Archived from the original on 2025-11-09. Retrieved 2026-03-05.
