Consumer Rights Wiki

Talk:DCS sues small YouTuber for accurate review

Revision as of 14:25, 22 April 2026 by IWillRememberMyPassword (talk | contribs) (→Should lawsuit pages be titled for the actual cases?: new section)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Latest comment: 22 April by IWillRememberMyPassword in topic Should lawsuit pages be titled for the actual cases?

long title

edit
Latest comment: 21 April2 comments2 people in discussion

perhaps we change to smth like "DCS sues YouTuber for accurate review of their product"? SinexTitan (talk) 22:46, 21 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

  Done AnotherConsumerRightsPerson (talk) 16:58, 21 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Should lawsuit pages be titled for the actual cases?

edit
Latest comment: 22 April1 comment1 person in discussion

Question. The case itself is titled Deep Cycle Systems Pty Ltd v Fischer. The judgement is publicly available and should also be posted. IWillRememberMyPassword (talk) 14:25, 22 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Talk:DCS_sues_small_YouTuber_for_accurate_review&oldid=51996"