Storage Pricing
🔧 Article status notice: This article heavily relies on AI/LLMs
This article has been marked because its heavy use of LLM generated text may affect its percieved or actual reliability and credibility.
To contact a moderator for removal of this notice once the article's issues have been resolved, please use either the Moderator's noticeboard, or the #appeals
channel on our Discord server (Join using this link]) or use the talk pages on the wiki and leave a message to any of the moderators. List of current moderators.
Learn more ▼
⚠️ Article status notice: This article has been marked as incomplete
This article needs additional work for its sourcing and verifiability to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues.
This notice will be removed once sufficient documentation has been added to establish the systemic nature of these issues. Once you believe the article is ready to have its notice removed, please visit the Moderator's noticeboard, or the discord and post to the #appeals
channel.
Learn more ▼
Storage markup exploitation refers to the practice of charging excessive premiums for storage upgrades while simultaneously removing expandable storage options like microSD slots.
Overview[edit | edit source]
Manufacturers charge $100-300 for storage upgrades that cost them $5-15 in components. By removing microSD slots (2010-2020), consumers lost the ability to add 1TB for $50.
Cost Reality[edit | edit source]
Actual Component Costs (2024)[edit | edit source]
- 128GB NAND flash: $8-12
- 256GB NAND flash: $15-20
- 512GB NAND flash: $30-40
- 1TB NAND flash: $60-80
Consumer Prices[edit | edit source]
- 128GB → 256GB: +$100-200
- 256GB → 512GB: +$200-300
- 512GB → 1TB: +$300-500
Markup Calculation[edit | edit source]
- Actual cost difference (128→256GB): $7
- Charged difference: $150
- Markup: 2,043%
MicroSD Removal Timeline[edit | edit source]
The Elimination[edit | edit source]
- 2014: Most flagships have microSD
- 2015: Galaxy S6 removes microSD (backlash)
- 2016: Galaxy S7 brings it back
- 2017: Google Pixel never includes it
- 2018: OnePlus claims "confusing for users"
- 2020: Galaxy S21 removes permanently
- 2023: Only mid-range/budget phones retain
Manufacturer Excuses Debunked[edit | edit source]
"MicroSD is slower"[edit | edit source]
- Reality: A2 cards reach 160MB/s
- App performance identical in testing
- Users can choose speed vs capacity
- Internal storage also varies in speed
"Confuses users"[edit | edit source]
- Reality: 2 billion Android users managed fine 2010-2015
- Windows has drive letters for 40 years
- Digital cameras use SD cards without issue
- Nintendo Switch uses microSD successfully
"Security concerns"[edit | edit source]
- Reality: Encryption available since Android 4.0
- Adoptable storage merges SD securely
- iOS has no SD yet same security issues
- Corporate claim without evidence
"Reliability issues"[edit | edit source]
- Reality: Quality SD cards very reliable
- Internal NAND can also fail
- SD failure = replace card, NAND failure = replace phone
- Redundancy improves reliability
Price Manipulation Strategies[edit | edit source]
Base Model Crippling[edit | edit source]
- Deliberately inadequate base storage (64-128GB)
- System/apps consume 20-30GB
- Forces upgrade to usable tier
- "Anchoring" makes upgrade seem reasonable
Bundle Forcing[edit | edit source]
- Cannot buy just storage upgrade
- Must buy higher tier with unwanted features
- Example: Want 512GB iPhone? Must buy Pro model
Psychological Pricing[edit | edit source]
- $999 vs $1099 seems "only $100 more"
- Percentage markup hidden
- Compare to $50 microSD alternative blocked
Financial Impact Analysis[edit | edit source]
iPhone Storage Profit (Estimated)[edit | edit source]
Base iPhone 15 128GB: $999
- Component cost: ~$450
- 256GB version: $1099 (+$100)
- Extra NAND cost: $8
- Pure profit per upgrade: $92
- Units sold with upgrade: ~60 million/year
- Storage upgrade profit alone: $5.5 billion/year
Industry Wide[edit | edit source]
- 1.5 billion phones sold annually
- ~40% buy storage upgrade
- Average upgrade premium: $150
- Annual storage markup profit: $90 billion
Consumer Loss Calculation[edit | edit source]
Direct Losses[edit | edit source]
- Forced storage upgrades: $150-300 per phone
- Lost SD card option: $50-100 value
- Cloud storage subscriptions: $2-10/month
- Total per user: $200-500 per device cycle
Indirect Losses[edit | edit source]
- Cannot transfer storage to next phone
- Locked into ecosystem (photos/videos)
- Data overage charges
- Lost productivity from storage management
Cloud Storage Conspiracy[edit | edit source]
The Dual Profit Model[edit | edit source]
1. Remove local storage options 2. Provide inadequate base storage 3. Sell expensive upgrades 4. When full, sell cloud storage 5. Monthly recurring revenue forever
iCloud Example[edit | edit source]
- 5GB free (unchanged since 2011)
- 50GB: $0.99/month
- 200GB: $2.99/month
- 2TB: $9.99/month
- Lifetime cost: $1200+ vs $50 SD card
Market Collusion Evidence[edit | edit source]
Simultaneous Changes[edit | edit source]
- All manufacturers removed SD slots within 2 years
- Identical storage tiers (128/256/512)
- Similar pricing gaps ($100-200)
- Same excuses given
Patent Pooling[edit | edit source]
- SD card technology openly licensed
- No technical barriers
- Active choice to exclude
- Coordinated market behavior
Environmental Crime[edit | edit source]
Forced Obsolescence[edit | edit source]
- Phone functional but storage full
- Cannot expand, must replace
- 300 million phones discarded annually
- Preventable with $20 SD card
Resource Waste[edit | edit source]
- Rare earth mining for new phones
- Energy cost of manufacturing
- Shipping and packaging
- All for want of storage slot
Legal Actions[edit | edit source]
Antitrust Investigations[edit | edit source]
- EU investigating storage pricing (2023)
- South Korea fair trade probe (2022)
- Class action lawsuits in preparation
Proposed Regulations[edit | edit source]
- Mandatory expandable storage
- Price transparency requirements
- Markup limitations
- Bundling prohibitions
Consumer Alternatives[edit | edit source]
Current Options[edit | edit source]
- USB-C flash drives (inconvenient)
- Wireless storage devices (battery drain)
- Cloud services (privacy concerns)
- NAS devices (not portable)
Resistance Methods[edit | edit source]
- Buy base model + cloud alternative
- Support manufacturers with SD slots
- Used market with adequate storage
- Demand transparency in pricing
See Also[edit | edit source]
- MicroSD Card Removal Timeline
- NAND Flash Pricing History
- Cloud Storage Lock-in
- Planned Obsolescence
- Price Fixing
References[edit | edit source]
[1] NAND Flash spot prices - DRAMeXchange [2] iPhone component costs - TechInsights teardown [3] Samsung earnings reports 2015-2023 [4] EU Digital Markets Act investigation