Jump to content

Audible

From Consumer Rights Wiki

Article Status Notice: This Article is a stub


This article is underdeveloped, and needs additional work to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues. Learn more ▼

Article Status Notice: Inappropriate Tone/Word Usage

This article needs additional work to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues. Specifically it uses wording throughout that is non-compliant with the Editorial guidelines of this wiki.

Learn more ▼

Audible
Basic information
Founded 1995
Legal Structure Subsidiary
Industry Entertainment
Official website https://www.audible.com/

Audible is an audiobook and podcast service company owned by Amazon. The service platform has a dual content model that allows for individual purchases and downloads as well as streaming content available through a monthly subscription.

Consumer-impact summary[edit | edit source]

Audiobook monopoly[edit | edit source]

As a subsidiary of Amazon, a company that started as an online bookstore that now owns roughly 90% or more of the ebook industry [citation needed], Audible holds about 60% of audiobooks, leading to widespread criticism of monopoly behavior[citation needed].

DRM[edit | edit source]

Audible has their own file format for audiobooks which is called AAX file format and it contains DRM. This creates an ecosystem lock-in, causing users to use third-party software to break the DRM in order to listen to the audiobooks they've purchased outside of the Audible platform [citation needed].

Geo-blocking[edit | edit source]

Audible engages in geo-blocking, restricting certain content based upon the geographic location of the user.

Exploitative contracts[edit | edit source]

Like Kindle publishing, Audibe requests exclusive publishing to their platform; otherwise, rightsholders like authors and publishers are subjected to Audible's 75% cut of royalties[citation needed]. Digital media like ebooks and audiobooks tend to be the most lucrative medium for rightsholders as they cost the least to produce, so it is greatly exploitative when a digital platform demands a 75% cut to host the content.

Incidents[edit | edit source]

Using credits to subsidize streaming service[edit | edit source]

Main article: Audible subsidizes its streaming plan via premium credits

Short summary of the incident (could be the same as the summary preceding the article).

Alleged non-consensual enrollment[edit | edit source]

Main article: Amazon sued for enrolling and charging customers into Audible without consent

Amazon, and Audible by extension, is currently under a pending class-action lawsuit due to allegedly enrolling Amazon customers into the Audible subscription without permission. This is possible due to Amazon's forced retention of payment methods in which the company holds customers' card information for "faster checkout."

Encouraging AI use[edit | edit source]

Audible openly encourages AI use with the understanding ding that indie authors who self-publish may rely heavily on AI for content generation and book quantity[citation needed]. This has led to speculation that Audible is diluting the pool of author royalties[citation needed].

Products[edit | edit source]

Since 2015, Audible has attempted to create original content throughout the years, but few have proven successful, including short-form content[citation needed]. Now, they seek creator exclusivity by providing attractive deals to podcasters and other creators to publish exclusively on Audible[citation needed].

References[edit | edit source]