QIDI: Difference between revisions
fixed references |
Changed the incident date to March 31 as I was unable to verify any information to support the January 10th incident date |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
In early 2025, a consumer reported a catastrophic house fire allegedly caused by a Qidi Tech Plus 4 3D printer. The incident gained widespread attention after the user claimed their report was censored on the company's official subreddit.<ref name="RedditPost">{{Cite web | | In early 2025, a consumer reported a catastrophic house fire allegedly caused by a Qidi Tech Plus 4 3D printer. The incident gained widespread attention after the user claimed their report was censored on the company's official subreddit.<ref name="RedditPost">{{Cite web |author=r/3Dprinting |date=31 March 2025 |title=R/QidiTech3d Permanently banned me for warning people after my family lost everything from a fire! |url=https://www.reddit.com/r/3Dprinting/comments/1jnuju1/rqiditech3d_permanently_banned_me_for_warning/ |access-date=5 Aug 2025 |website=[[Reddit]]}}</ref> The subsequent public outcry led to a community-driven technical investigation that identified potential systemic design flaws, including an under-specified Solid-State Relay (SSR) and the absence of a thermal fuse, which could lead to thermal runaway.<ref name="MakerForums">{{Cite web |date=1 Apr 2025 |title=Qidi permanently banned a customer for reporting that a Qidi Plus4 caught fire and destroyed their entire house |url=https://forum.makerforums.info/t/qidi-permanently-banned-a-customer-for-reporting-that-a-qidi-plus4-caught-fire-and-destroyed-their-entire-house/92980 |access-date=5 Aug 2025 |website=Maker Forums}}</ref> In response, Qidi Tech initiated a program to provide replacement parts and released firmware updates, though the adequacy of these solutions was debated within the 3D printing community.<ref name="PFF164">{{Cite web |author=@3DMusketeers |date=1 Nov 2024 |title=Fire Hazards & Fight Club Fails! - PrintFixFriday 164 |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvhohMVPl1Q |access-date=5 Aug 2025 |website=[[YouTube]]}}</ref> | ||
==Background== | ==Background== | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==The incident: House fire and censorship allegations== | ==The incident: House fire and censorship allegations== | ||
The controversy began on | The controversy began on March 31, 2025, when Reddit user u/ProgressLocal1511 alleged that their Qidi Tech Plus 4 printer had catastrophically failed and started a fire that resulted in the complete destruction of their home. According to the user's account, the printer was operating with PETG filament. Approximately 15 to 30 minutes after a routine check, smoke alarms were triggered. The user discovered dense smoke and flames emanating from the rear of the machine, and the fire escalated too rapidly to be controlled with a home fire extinguisher.<ref name="RedditPost" /> | ||
The incident's scope expanded significantly when the user reported that their attempts to warn other owners on the official r/QidiTech3d subreddit were censored. They claimed their posts were removed and their account was permanently banned from the forum.<ref name="RedditPost" /> This action was perceived by the broader community as an attempt to suppress critical safety information, triggering the "Streisand effect," where the effort to censor the report amplified its reach across social media and 3D printing news outlets.<ref name="Fabbaloo">{{Cite web |last=Stevenson |first=Kerry |date=4 Apr 2025 |title=Reports Emerge of Fires Caused by Qidi Plus 4 3D Printer |url=https://www.fabbaloo.com/news/reports-emerge-of-fires-caused-by-qidi-plus-4-3d-printer |access-date=5 Aug 2025 |website=Fabbaloo}}</ref> | The incident's scope expanded significantly when the user reported that their attempts to warn other owners on the official r/QidiTech3d subreddit were censored. They claimed their posts were removed and their account was permanently banned from the forum.<ref name="RedditPost" /> This action was perceived by the broader community as an attempt to suppress critical safety information, triggering the "Streisand effect," where the effort to censor the report amplified its reach across social media and 3D printing news outlets.<ref name="Fabbaloo">{{Cite web |last=Stevenson |first=Kerry |date=4 Apr 2025 |title=Reports Emerge of Fires Caused by Qidi Plus 4 3D Printer |url=https://www.fabbaloo.com/news/reports-emerge-of-fires-caused-by-qidi-plus-4-3d-printer |access-date=5 Aug 2025 |website=Fabbaloo}}</ref> | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
===Solid-state relay (SSR) failure=== | ===Solid-state relay (SSR) failure=== | ||
The primary component identified as a point of failure was the Solid-State Relay (SSR), an electronic switch that controls power to the mains-powered chamber heater. The investigation concluded that the SSR was under-specified for the electrical load, particularly in regions with a 110V power grid. The higher current draw at 110V caused the SSR to operate near its maximum rating, leading to overheating and a high likelihood of failure.<ref name="RedditSSR_PSA">{{Cite web | | The primary component identified as a point of failure was the Solid-State Relay (SSR), an electronic switch that controls power to the mains-powered chamber heater. The investigation concluded that the SSR was under-specified for the electrical load, particularly in regions with a 110V power grid. The higher current draw at 110V caused the SSR to operate near its maximum rating, leading to overheating and a high likelihood of failure.<ref name="RedditSSR_PSA">{{Cite web |author=r/QIDI |date=2024 |title=PSA: SSR Safety Issues With Qidi Tech PLUS 4 Printer: 'The way it's been handled so far can only be described as negligent... As of right now I cannot recommend this printer.' |url=https://www.reddit.com/r/QIDI/comments/1ghh06b/psa_ssr_safety_issues_with_qidi_tech_plus_4/ |access-date=5 Aug 2025 |website=[[Reddit]]}}</ref> | ||
Crucially, a common failure mode for an SSR is to fail "closed," meaning it becomes permanently stuck in the "on" position. This allows unregulated power to flow to the heating element, causing a thermal runaway where the temperature rises uncontrollably until a component ignites.<ref name="MakerForums" /> | Crucially, a common failure mode for an SSR is to fail "closed," meaning it becomes permanently stuck in the "on" position. This allows unregulated power to flow to the heating element, causing a thermal runaway where the temperature rises uncontrollably until a component ignites.<ref name="MakerForums" /> | ||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
===Media coverage=== | ===Media coverage=== | ||
Leading 3D printing news publications, including Fabbaloo and All3DP, covered the story in detail, criticizing the initial censorship and calling for greater transparency.<ref name="Fabbaloo" /><ref name="All3DP" /> Influential YouTube channels, such as 3D Musketeers and Ricky Impey, produced in-depth videos explaining the technical issues, which were instrumental in pressuring Qidi Tech to publicly address the problem.<ref name="PFF186">{{Cite web | | Leading 3D printing news publications, including Fabbaloo and All3DP, covered the story in detail, criticizing the initial censorship and calling for greater transparency.<ref name="Fabbaloo" /><ref name="All3DP" /> Influential YouTube channels, such as 3D Musketeers and Ricky Impey, produced in-depth videos explaining the technical issues, which were instrumental in pressuring Qidi Tech to publicly address the problem.<ref name="PFF186">{{Cite web |author=@3DMusketeers |date=4 Apr 2025 |title=Qidi Plus 4: 3D Printer or Firestarter? - PrintFixFriday 186 |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=6sktfZMhur4 |access-date=5 Aug 2025 |website=[[YouTube]]}}</ref> | ||
===Community-developed solutions=== | ===Community-developed solutions=== | ||
In response to the perceived inadequacy of the official fix, technically skilled users designed and shared their own safety modifications. These community-driven guides detailed how to replace the under-specified stock SSR with a higher-rated component and, most importantly, how to add the missing thermal fuse to the heater circuit. This proactive response created a decentralized, open-source repair program that provided a more robust safety solution than the one offered by the manufacturer.<ref name="PrintablesFix">{{Cite web |title=Fail-safe Chamber Heater SSR for Qidi Plus 4 |url=https://www.printables.com/model/1053814-fail-safe-chamber-heater-ssr-for-qidi-plus-4 |access-date=5 Aug 2025 |website=Printables}}</ref><ref name="YouTubeFix">{{Cite web | | In response to the perceived inadequacy of the official fix, technically skilled users designed and shared their own safety modifications. These community-driven guides detailed how to replace the under-specified stock SSR with a higher-rated component and, most importantly, how to add the missing thermal fuse to the heater circuit. This proactive response created a decentralized, open-source repair program that provided a more robust safety solution than the one offered by the manufacturer.<ref name="PrintablesFix">{{Cite web |title=Fail-safe Chamber Heater SSR for Qidi Plus 4 |url=https://www.printables.com/model/1053814-fail-safe-chamber-heater-ssr-for-qidi-plus-4 |access-date=5 Aug 2025 |website=Printables}}</ref><ref name="YouTubeFix">{{Cite web |author=@3DPrintSOS |date=20 Nov 2024 |title=FIXING the Qidi Plus 4 - DIY SSR Upgrade |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYKGGycYN2w |access-date=5 Aug 2025 |website=[[YouTube]]}}</ref> | ||
==Current status== | ==Current status== | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references | <references /> | ||
[[Category:Incidents]] | [[Category:Incidents]] | ||
[[Category:Qidi Tech]] | [[Category:Qidi Tech]] | ||
[[Category:Qidi Tech Plus 4]] | [[Category:Qidi Tech Plus 4]] | ||