Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderators' noticeboard: Difference between revisions

 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 113: Line 113:
:@[[User:Sojourna|Sojourna]], Thanks for fixing that article. I'm keeping incomplete over stub since it's long enough to be useful, but just not complete. '''''[[User:JackFromWisconsin|📎 JackFromWisconsin]]''''' ([[User_talk:JackFromWisconsin|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/JackFromWisconsin|contribs]]) 23:09, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
:@[[User:Sojourna|Sojourna]], Thanks for fixing that article. I'm keeping incomplete over stub since it's long enough to be useful, but just not complete. '''''[[User:JackFromWisconsin|📎 JackFromWisconsin]]''''' ([[User_talk:JackFromWisconsin|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/JackFromWisconsin|contribs]]) 23:09, 1 September 2025 (UTC)


== Protect Category:Wiki Root ==
==Protect Category:Wiki Root==


I think [[:Category:Wiki root]] and other major categories should be fully protected as confirmed/autoconfirmed users can still move it. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|AnotherConsumerRightsPerson]] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 08:02, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
I think [[:Category:Wiki root]] and other major categories should be fully protected as confirmed/autoconfirmed users can still move it. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|AnotherConsumerRightsPerson]] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 08:02, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
:Thank you for posting this. If you find other categories that need to be protected, please let us know. I just went ahead and locked the main page for that category. - [[User:Atsumari|Atsumari]] ([[User talk:Atsumari|talk]]) 02:33, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
==Appeal Artificial intelligence deletion==
Somebody proposed deletion of the article for the reason: "Does not pertain directly to consumer rights or violations."
Further, in the discussion it was noted that the article is wordy.
I agree that the article needs significant revision.  It has more detail than needed on some areas (e.g. web scraping), and totally misses other important areas. 
I think it might be easier to improve the existing article, rather than having to start one from scratch.
I see AI more as a theme/background article.  AI is so pervasive now, and affects people in so many ways, that I think it makes sense to have at least one article on it.
Things that I think such an article should cover include:
Data centers - environmental impacts, community impacts, energy demand and subsidy by electricity and water rate payers, and how many of these agreements are made in secret, even in nominally democratic/open governmental systems.  In the US data centers are often located in marginalized communities, where people are not as organized to protect their community .  (This is not exclusively an AI thing might be worth a separate article about data centers in general, covering crypto mining operations, etc.)
Control of information - Use of LLM in place of search is decimating independent information sources (taking away advertising revenue, taking away views). 
Inaccuracy and inappropriate use of LLM.  "Hallucinations"  People not understanding what an LLM is and assuming they are more capable than they are.  LLM make a poor substitute for human written product reviews.  (Inaccurate, praises whatever the user wants - even products that don't exist.)
Intellectual property - piracy in training data (using stolen data), use of output.
Privacy and security - data poisoning, ease of subverting guardrails, gathering data for training, revealing prompts, law enforcement review of chatbot prompts and outputs, etc.
Concerns about possible effects on users - AI psychosis, etc. 
Labor concerns - conditions of labelers/piece workers.
Liability - LLM are often inaccurate, what happens when the AI harms people (libel, suicide, etc.)
In short, I think there is a lot about LLMs and AI that is important for consumers.  I hope the above gives some sense of why.  However, I only just started here, and will be careful to read the policies and examples in more detail before editing articles.
I have sources for a bunch of this, will be adding them to the article talk page as time permits.  Thank you. [[User:Drakeula|Drakeula]] ([[User talk:Drakeula|talk]]) 18:33, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
:Thanks for the heads up. Issue has been addressed in the Discussion page of the article. The notice has been removed [[User:Beanie Bo|Beanie Bo]] ([[User talk:Beanie Bo|talk]]) 21:16, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Return to the project page "Moderators' noticeboard".