Consumer Rights Wiki:Moderator guidelines: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 129: | Line 129: | ||
A good article, not in need of marking, should '''substantiate its claims.''' | A good article, not in need of marking, should '''substantiate its claims.''' | ||
*Utilise sources in line with [[Wiki | *Utilise sources in line with [[Consumer Rights Wiki:Wiki content policies#Verifiability|the Wiki's verifiability policy]]. | ||
*Corroborate patterns or systemic relevance through multiple examples or reports | *Corroborate patterns or systemic relevance through multiple examples or reports | ||
| Line 141: | Line 141: | ||
====E. Tone and presentation:==== | ====E. Tone and presentation:==== | ||
A good (non-Theme) article, not in need of marking, will be written in accordance with the Wiki's implementation of [[Wiki | A good (non-Theme) article, not in need of marking, will be written in accordance with the Wiki's implementation of [[Consumer Rights Wiki:Wiki content policies|NPOV (Neutral Point-Of-View):]] | ||
*'''The article should be neutral and factual,''' without unnecessarily emotional language, and without coming across as an expression of personal grievances or irrelevant hypotheticals. | *'''The article should be neutral and factual,''' without unnecessarily emotional language, and without coming across as an expression of personal grievances or irrelevant hypotheticals. | ||