Talk:Retroactively amended purchase: Difference between revisions
Add topicMoveLateral (talk | contribs) m MoveLateral moved page Talk:Retroactively Amended Purchase Experience to Talk:Retroactively amended experiences without leaving a redirect: A name change because no, we cannot have articles with titles that spell out "RAPE". |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Also, this comes across as a bit of a chatgpt dump. | Also, this comes across as a bit of a chatgpt dump. | ||
-Keith | -Keith | ||
I move that [[Retroactively amended experiences]] be deleted rather than a redirect. The title "retroactively amended experience" is nonsense. It was an attempt to fix the problem mentioned above, which I later corrected to the current [[Retroactively amended purchase]] by moving the page. At the moment, though, moving pages makes a redirect rather than simply renaming the page. There are also no remaining links to "retroactively amended experience", anyway.[[User:Mingyee|Mingyee]] ([[User talk:Mingyee|talk]]) 10:52, 17 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
: The moving of a page not deleting but redirecting is intented behaviour to avoid broken links in cases of pages already populated and part of the wiki. I have deleted the redirect for this now though. [[User:Kostas|Kostas]] ([[User talk:Kostas|talk]]) 12:38, 18 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:38, 18 January 2025
I suggest a move and title change for this page - let's move away from the edgy analogies. (ok - have been informed that this is one that Louis has used. In that case, it's still not appropriate for an article title, but a section within the article can describe it as a popular coloquial term, and highlight why the comparison is made, and reference https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=R(etroactively)+A(mended)+P(urchase)+E(xperience)
Also, this comes across as a bit of a chatgpt dump. -Keith
I move that Retroactively amended experiences be deleted rather than a redirect. The title "retroactively amended experience" is nonsense. It was an attempt to fix the problem mentioned above, which I later corrected to the current Retroactively amended purchase by moving the page. At the moment, though, moving pages makes a redirect rather than simply renaming the page. There are also no remaining links to "retroactively amended experience", anyway.Mingyee (talk) 10:52, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- The moving of a page not deleting but redirecting is intented behaviour to avoid broken links in cases of pages already populated and part of the wiki. I have deleted the redirect for this now though. Kostas (talk) 12:38, 18 January 2025 (UTC)