Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Draft policy on the inclusion of positive consumer-focused acts and practices: Difference between revisions
Add topicRobotToaster (talk | contribs) →Any thoughts?: Reply |
→Any thoughts?: Reply |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:::Instead of marking positive articles, you could add a disclaimer template at the top to those that don't contain negative incidents. Something like: "We currently have no consumer rights violations recorded for this organisation, if you are aware of any, please add them." | :::Instead of marking positive articles, you could add a disclaimer template at the top to those that don't contain negative incidents. Something like: "We currently have no consumer rights violations recorded for this organisation, if you are aware of any, please add them." | ||
:::(I'd love to see that expanded to have a "it has been X days since this company fucked people over" at the top of every organisation, but I imagine that would be a lot more difficult) [[User:RobotToaster|RobotToaster]] ([[User talk:RobotToaster|talk]]) 18:17, 24 June 2026 (UTC) | :::(I'd love to see that expanded to have a "it has been X days since this company fucked people over" at the top of every organisation, but I imagine that would be a lot more difficult) [[User:RobotToaster|RobotToaster]] ([[User talk:RobotToaster|talk]]) 18:17, 24 June 2026 (UTC) | ||
::::I think this is a fairly good solution, it avoids explicitly marking the article as 'positive' but also gives the reader context to prevent confusion [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 23:56, 1 July 2026 (UTC) | |||
:I have a few thoughts as a more casual editor, I hope they're helpful | :I have a few thoughts as a more casual editor, I hope they're helpful | ||
:*On the EA Command and Conquer example, releasing source code is often suggested as a way to preserve games after their online servers have shut down. The original online servers are long gone for C&C, so I'd argue that example could belong here. (I'd agree it doesn't belong here if it's a purely offline game however) | :*On the EA Command and Conquer example, releasing source code is often suggested as a way to preserve games after their online servers have shut down. The original online servers are long gone for C&C, so I'd argue that example could belong here. (I'd agree it doesn't belong here if it's a purely offline game however) | ||