Consumer Rights Wiki:Moderator applications: Difference between revisions
m Copyedit |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The Consumer Rights Wiki needs YOU! | The Consumer Rights Wiki needs YOU! | ||
We're always looking for people willing to go the extra mile for consumer rights and help the Wiki be the best it can possibly be. This will serve as your guide to the | We're always looking for people willing to go the extra mile for consumer rights and help the Wiki be the best it can possibly be. This will serve as your guide to applying for either a moderator role or the superconfirmed role (don't worry, it's not too painful!). | ||
Upon receiving an application, we will review it and aim to get back to you as quickly as possible. Applications should be sent to the email [email protected], and should contain an answer to | Upon receiving an application, we will review it and aim to get back to you as quickly as possible. Applications should be sent to the email [email protected], and should contain an answer to any required questions, as well as your Wiki username and any other relevant information (other sites you've modded on, Wikipedia edits you've made, etc.) so we can examine your edit history. | ||
==Superconfirmed vs moderator== | |||
Superconfirmed users have a different set of permissions from full moderators; the important differences are below: | |||
===Superconfirmed=== | |||
* Can edit most protected pages | |||
* Can delete pages | |||
* Can remove article notices | |||
===Moderators=== | |||
* Have access to all superconfirmed permissions | |||
* Can ban users and IPs | |||
* Can protect pages | |||
The overall intention is that most of our regular content editors should end up as Superconfirmed, whereas the moderator role is for those who want to go the extra mile. | |||
==Requirements== | ==Requirements== | ||
We want to strike a balance between sensible caution over the handing out of privileges, and the need to make the application process accessible and relatively pain-free (we certainly don't want to end up with Wikipedia's situation, where the strictness of their system has essentially served to block them from recruiting new moderators). As such, here's an overview of what we're looking for in an applicant: | We want to strike a balance between sensible caution over the handing out of privileges, and the need to make the application process accessible and relatively pain-free (we certainly don't want to end up with Wikipedia's situation, where the strictness of their system has essentially served to block them from recruiting new moderators). As such, here's an overview of what we're looking for in an applicant: | ||
===Edit history=== | ===Edit history=== | ||
Your edit history needs to demonstrate that you have an understanding of what the Wiki's purpose is, and what makes a good article. We will mostly look at your most recent substantial edits, and assess how well they fit with the Wiki's policies and guidelines. | |||
For the Superconfirmed role, you must have a month of activity on the wiki, and for the moderator role you must have 3 months' activity (in both cases wiki activity does not need to be contiguous, and experience on external wikis counts, provided that the wiki in question has a similar style of | |||
===Application questions=== | ===Application questions (Moderator applications only)=== | ||
*Why are you interested in moderating the Wiki? | *Why are you interested in moderating the Wiki? | ||