Template talk:Wplink: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 11 May by Rudxain in topic Pros and cons?
mNo edit summary |
→Pros and cons?: new section |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:It can be stuck on the talkpage I think. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 09:20, 24 March 2026 (UTC) | :It can be stuck on the talkpage I think. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 09:20, 24 March 2026 (UTC) | ||
== Pros and cons? == | |||
I want to know what's the diff between using <code><nowiki>[[wikipedia:]]</nowiki></code> and this. I still don't understand why this is necessary 😕 [[User:Rudxain|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain|talk]]) 23:53, 11 May 2026 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:53, 11 May 2026
 | This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0). |
Imported
Been a hot minute since I "created" this template, and coming back here I really should have made a note somewhere that I copied it from Warcraft Wiki's own Wplink template. Oops. Not sure where the CCSA 4.0 license should be stuck. — Sojourna (talk) 02:01, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
- It can be stuck on the talkpage I think. AnotherConsumerRightsPerson (talk) 09:20, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
Pros and cons?
I want to know what's the diff between using [[wikipedia:]] and this. I still don't understand why this is necessary 😕 Rudxain (talk) 23:53, 11 May 2026 (UTC)